首页> 外文期刊>Computers in Human Behavior >Lurking towards empowerment: Explaining propensity to engage with online health support groups and its association with positive outcomes
【24h】

Lurking towards empowerment: Explaining propensity to engage with online health support groups and its association with positive outcomes

机译:潜伏于赋权:解释与在线健康支持团体互动的倾向及其与积极成果的关联

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Online health support groups (OHSGs) offer opportunities for people with various health conditions to gain support and associated physical and mental health benefits, however evidence suggests that those who choose to lurk in OHSGs may be less likely to accrue benefits (e.g. empowering outcomes) than those who actively contribute. Most research to date has focused on comparing the outcomes of OSHG engagement for lurkers and participators, yet there has been little research which has considered how the different reasons for lurking might be associated with levels of participation and empowering processes. In this investigation we used a survey to gather data from 237 participants to develop a new scale to measure factors influencing the Propensity for Online Community Contribution (POCCS), and to explore the relationship between these factors and OHSG engagement behaviour and empowering processes accrued from OHSG use. The POCCS comprised nine factors, 1) poor sense of community; 2) struggles with self-expression; 3) inhibited disclosure and privacy; 4) negative online interactions; 5) ease of access and use; 6) health preventing contribution; 7) delayed and selective contribution; 8) goals met without contribution; and 9) lack of time. Five of these factors (1, 3, 6, 7, and 8) significantly predicted OHSG contribution and positive experiences in the form of empowering processes. Findings advocate a more nuanced approach to OHSG engagement, rather than a simple lurking/engaging dichotomy, and may enhance understanding of the relationship between OHSG use and perceived benefits.
机译:在线健康支持小组(OHSGs)为处于各种健康状况的人们提供获得支持以及相关的身心健康福利的机会,但是有证据表明,选择潜伏在OHSG中的人获得福利的可能性(例如增强结果)比那些积极贡献的人。迄今为止,大多数研究都集中于比较潜伏者和参与者参与OSHG的结果,但是很少有研究考虑潜伏的不同原因如何与参与水平和赋权过程相关联。在这项调查中,我们使用了一项调查,从237名参与者中收集了数据,以开发新的量表来衡量影响在线社区贡献(POCCS)的因素,并探讨这些因素与OHSG参与行为和OHSG产生的赋权过程之间的关系。采用。 POCCS包含九个因素:1)社区意识差; 2)与自我表达作斗争; 3)禁止披露和隐私; 4)负面的在线互动; 5)易于使用和使用; 6)预防健康贡献; 7)延迟和选择性的捐助; 8)实现目标没有贡献; 9)没有时间。其中五个因素(1、3、6、7和8)以赋权过程的形式显着预测了OHSG的贡献和积极经验。研究结果主张采用更细微的方法来参与OHSG,而不是简单地潜伏/参与二分法,并且可能会加深对OHSG使用与感知收益之间关系的理解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号