首页> 外文期刊>Computers & geosciences >Modelling of soil moisture retention curve using machine learning techniques: Artificial and deep neural networks vs support vector regression models
【24h】

Modelling of soil moisture retention curve using machine learning techniques: Artificial and deep neural networks vs support vector regression models

机译:使用机器学习技术对土壤水分保持曲线进行建模:人工和深度神经网络与支持向量回归模型

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Soil water retention curve (SWRC) is of fundamental importance in analyzing both flow and contaminant transport in the vadose zone. Field and/or laboratory-based measurements of soil moisture and soil suction - the two main variables that are used to develop SWRC - is often time consuming and sometimes impossible. In this study, plausibility of various machine learning techniques to simulate SWRC of loamy sand are evaluated. Specifically, the machine learning techniques that are investigated include: three support vector regression (SVR) models (i.e. radial basis function (RBF), linear and polynomial kernels), single-layer artificial neural network (ANN), and deep neural network (DNN). The soil moisture and soil suction were measured using time-domain reflectometer (TDR) and tensiometer, respectively. The data were collected under both monotonic wetting and drying of a disturbed sample of loamy sand soil. These datasets were used to train and test the machine learning techniques. Results show that the RBF-based SVR outperforms all the other machine learning techniques in simulating SWRC for loamy sand subjected to either monotonic wetting or drying. The ANN and DNN models simulated soil water content with a RMSE of 0.004-0.009 cm(3)/cm(3) for monotonic wetting in the training phase; and 0.002-0.003 cm(3)/cm(3) for monotonic drying in training phase. In the testing phase, ANN and DNN models simulated soil water content with RMSE of 0.02-0.121 cm(3)/cm(3) and 0.003. The RBF-based SVR model - the best performing machine learning model - simulated soil water content with RMSE of 0.006 and 0.002 cm(3)/cm(3) for soil subjected monotonic wetting and drying, respectively. In the testing phase, the RBF-based SVRmodel simulated soil water content with RMSE of 0.02-0.033 cm(3)/cm(3) and 0.003-0.006 cm(3)/cm(3) for soil under monotonic wetting and drying, respectively. These machine models, therefore, provided plausible SWRC simulations, and the models do not require knowledge of physical soil parameters.
机译:土壤水分保持曲线(SWRC)对于分析渗流带中的流量和污染物运移至关重要。基于田间和/或实验室的土壤水分和土壤吸力测量-用于开发SWRC的两个主要变量-通常很耗时,有时甚至是不可能的。在这项研究中,评估了模拟松质砂土SWRC的各种机器学习技术的合理性。具体来说,研究的机器学习技术包括:三种支持向量回归(SVR)模型(即径向基函数(RBF),线性和多项式内核),单层人工神经网络(ANN)和深层神经网络(DNN) )。土壤水分和吸力分别使用时域反射计(TDR)和张力计进行测量。在扰动的壤土砂土样品的单调润湿和干燥下收集数据。这些数据集用于训练和测试机器学习技术。结果表明,基于RBF的SVR在模拟单调湿润或干燥的壤土砂土的SWRC方面优于其他所有机器学习技术。 ANN和DNN模型模拟土壤水分含量,训练阶段单调润湿的RMSE为0.004-0.009 cm(3)/ cm(3);和0.002-0.003 cm(3)/ cm(3)用于训练阶段的单调干燥。在测试阶段,ANN和DNN模型模拟的土壤含水量的RMSE为0.02-0.121 cm(3)/ cm(3)和0.003。基于RBF的SVR模型-表现最佳的机器学习模型-模拟的土壤水分含量分别为单调润湿和干燥的RMSE为0.006和0.002 cm(3)/ cm(3)。在测试阶段,基于RBF的SVRmodel模拟了土壤在单调润湿和干燥条件下的土壤水分,RMSE为0.02-0.033 cm(3)/ cm(3)和0.003-0.006 cm(3)/ cm(3),分别。因此,这些机器模型提供了合理的SWRC模拟,并且这些模型不需要了解土壤物理参数。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号