...
首页> 外文期刊>Computers & education >Examining temporal dynamics of self-regulated learning behaviors in STEM learning: A network approach
【24h】

Examining temporal dynamics of self-regulated learning behaviors in STEM learning: A network approach

机译:检查词干学习中自治学习行为的时间动态:网络方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

From a network perspective, self-regulated learning (SRL) can be conceptualized as networks of mutually interacting self-regulatory learning behaviors. Nevertheless, the research on how SRL behaviors dynamically interact over time in a network architecture is still in its infancy, especially in the context of STEM (sciences, technology, engineering, and math) learning. In the present paper, we used a multilevel vector autoregression (VAR) model to examine the temporal dynamics of SRL behaviors as 101 students designed green buildings in Energy3D, a simulation-based computer-aided design (CAD) environment. We examined how different performance groups (i.e., unsuccessful, success-oriented, and mastery-oriented groups) differed in SRL competency, actual SRL behaviors, and SRL networks. We found that the three groups had no significant difference in their perceived SRL competency; however, they differed in SRL behaviors of evaluation. Both the mastery-oriented and success-oriented groups performed more evaluation behaviors than the unsuccessful group. Moreover, the mastery-oriented group showed stronger interaction between SRL behaviors than the success-oriented group and the unsuccessful group. The SRL networks of the three groups shared some similarities, but they were different from each other in general. This study has significant theoretical and methodological implications for the advancement of research in SRL dynamics.
机译:从网络角度来看,自我监管的学习(SRL)可以概念化为相互交互的自我监管学习行为的网络。尽管如此,关于SRL行为如何随着时间的推移动态交互的研究仍然在其初期,特别是在茎(科学,技术,工程和数学)学习的背景下。在本文中,我们使用了多级传染媒介自助性(var)模型,以检查SRL行为的时间动态,因为101名学生在Energy3D中设计的绿色建筑,一种基于仿真的计算机辅助设计(CAD)环境。我们检查了SRL能力,实际SRL行为和SRL网络中不同的性能组(即,不成功,成功,掌握和掌握的群体)的方式。我们发现三组对他们所感知的SRL能力没有显着差异;但是,它们在评估的SRL行为中不同。面向掌握的和成功的团体都表现出比不成功的群体更多的评估行为。此外,掌握导向的组在SRL行为之间的相互作用比成功的成功组和不成功的群体之间表现出更强的相互作用。三组的SRL网络共享了一些相似之处,但它们彼此不同。本研究具有对SRL动态研究进步的显着理论和方法论影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号