首页> 外文期刊>Computers & education >Exploratory study on the patterns of online interaction and knowledge co-construction in project-based learning
【24h】

Exploratory study on the patterns of online interaction and knowledge co-construction in project-based learning

机译:基于项目的学习中的在线互动和知识共建模式的探索性研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study aims to investigate the patterns and the quality of online interaction during project-based learning (PjBL) on both micro and macro levels. To achieve this purpose, PjBL was implemented with online group activities in an undergraduate course. Social network analysis (SNA) and content analysis were employed to analyze online interaction during project work. According to the SNA results generated from the online discussion boards, the group cohesiveness of seven teams, indicated by density indices, varied considerably, from as low as 9.81 to as high as 30.00. Regarding the content analysis of two teams with high project scores (Teams F and C), team members not only shared information (Phase I), but also identified the areas of disagreement and clarified the goals and strategies (Phase II). They also conducted some negotiations (Phase III). However, team members with low project scores (Teams C and E) shared information and stated their opinions in most cases (Phase I), with not much social construction in the higher level. Although both Team C and G showed high level of group cohesiveness among the seven teams, it is notable that the high-performing Team G dedicated nearly 39.3 percent of online discussion to negotiating and co-constructing knowledge, contrary to the 5.9 percent of low-performing Team C. Based upon the findings, some implications were proposed for further research.
机译:这项研究旨在从微观和宏观两个层面研究基于项目的学习(PjBL)期间在线互动的模式和质量。为了实现此目的,PjBL在大学课程中通过在线小组活动实施。在项目工作期间,使用社交网络分析(SNA)和内容分析来分析在线交互。根据在线讨论委员会生成的SNA结果,以密度指数表示的七个团队的团队凝聚力差异很大,从低至9.81到高至30.00。关于两个项目得分较高的团队(团队F和C)的内容分析,团队成员不仅共享信息(第一阶段),而且确定分歧的领域并阐明目标和策略(第二阶段)。他们还进行了一些谈判(第三阶段)。但是,项目得分较低的团队成员(C和E团队)在大多数情况下(第一阶段)共享信息并发表意见,而上级的社会建设并不多。尽管C团队和G团队在这七个团队中均表现出较高的团队凝聚力,但值得注意的是,绩效较高的G团队将近39.3%的在线讨论专用于谈判和共同构建知识,而低水平的5.9%根据调查结果,提出了一些需要进一步研究的建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号