首页> 外文期刊>Computers & Chemical Engineering >Dynamic model-based fault diagnosis for (bio)chemical batch processes
【24h】

Dynamic model-based fault diagnosis for (bio)chemical batch processes

机译:基于动态模型的生化批处理过程的故障诊断

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To ensure constant and satisfactory product quality, close monitoring of batch processes is an absolute requirement in the (bio)chemical industry. Principal Component Analysis (PCA)-based techniques exploit historical databases for fault detection and diagnosis. In this paper, the fault detection and diagnosis performance of Batch Dynamic PCA (BDPCA) and Auto-Regressive PCA (ARPCA) is compared with Multi-way PCA (MPCA). Although these methods have been studied before, the performance is often compared based on few validation batches. Additionally, the focus is on fast fault detection, while correct fault identification is often considered of lesser importance. In this paper, MPCA, BDPCA, and ARPCA are benchmarked on an extensive dataset of a simulated penicillin fermentation. Both the detection speed, false alarm rate and correctness of the fault diagnosis are taken into account. The results indicate increased detection speed when using ARPCA as opposed to MPCA and BDPCA at the cost of fault classification accuracy.
机译:为了确保产品质量稳定且令人满意,对分批过程进行严格监控是(生物)化工行业的绝对要求。基于主成分分析(PCA)的技术利用历史数据库进行故障检测和诊断。本文将批处理动态PCA(BDPCA)和自回归PCA(ARPCA)与多路PCA(MPCA)的故障检测和诊断性能进行了比较。尽管以前已经研究过这些方法,但通常会基于很少的验证批次来比较性能。此外,重点是快速故障检测,而正确的故障识别通常被认为次要。在本文中,MPCA,BDPCA和ARPCA在大量模拟青霉素发酵的数据集上进行了基准测试。同时考虑了检测速度,误报率和故障诊断的正确性。结果表明与使用MPCA和BDPCA相比,使用ARPCA时检测速度提高了,但是却以故障分类的准确性为代价。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号