首页> 外文期刊>The computer & internet lawyer >Should State Law Enforcement Officials Be Required to Develop and Implement Minimization Protocols to Govern the Execution of Digital Search Warrants?
【24h】

Should State Law Enforcement Officials Be Required to Develop and Implement Minimization Protocols to Govern the Execution of Digital Search Warrants?

机译:如果国家执法官员必须制定和实施最小化协议,以管理数字搜索权证的执行?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Molina, Martinez, Dorelas, Perkins, Keown, and Holley exemplify the courts' wrestling with issues of transposing Fourth Amendment and Article 14 protections in digital contexts. Let us be clear about what we are not saying. We are not suggesting that the traditional warrant requirements of probable cause, scope, and particularity that historically have underpinned the review of search warrants, including warrants for digital evidence, cannot adequately protect against unlawful seizures and searches in certain circumstances. Rather, we are suggesting that courts will continue to struggle to incorporate electronic search and seizure law into the existing paradigm of Fourth Amendment and Article 14 reasonableness absent the development and widespread implementation of minimization protocols to govern the execution of such search warrants. Their time, we believe, is coming.
机译:莫里纳,马丁内斯,多雷拉斯,珀金斯,凯尔斯和霍利举例说明法院摔跤,就误炫了第四修正案和第14条在数字背景下的保护问题。让我们清楚我们不是说什么。我们并不是暗示历史上历史上的可能原因,范围和特殊性的传统认股权证要求,包括对搜索权证的审查,包括用于数字证据的认股权证,不能充分防止在某些情况下对非法癫痫发作和搜查。相反,我们暗示法院将继续努力将电子搜索和扣押法纳入第四修正案的现有范式,第14条合理性缺乏发展和普遍执行最小化协议,以管理执行此类搜查权证。他们的时间,我们相信即将来临。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号