首页> 外文期刊>Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education >Private tutoring in Eastern Europe and Central Asia: policy choices and implications
【24h】

Private tutoring in Eastern Europe and Central Asia: policy choices and implications

机译:东欧和中亚的私人补习:政策选择和启示

获取原文
           

摘要

Private tutoring has become increasingly visible in Eastern Europe and Central Asia since the collapse of the socialist bloc in the early 1990s. Yet, this unprecedented growth of private tutoring, in its varied forms and arrangements, has remained largely unnoticed by policymakers in the region. Based on the data from the cross‐national studies of private tutoring in 12 countries, this explorative study examines factors driving the demand for private tutoring and discusses government responses to private tutoring in Azerbaijan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Georgia, Lithuania, Mongolia, Poland, Slovakia, and Ukraine (research conducted in 2004-2005) and Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Tajikistan (research conducted in 2005-2006). The article analyzes various policy contexts and examines challenges that confront education stakeholders and policymakers as they formulate their responses to the rapidly‐spreading and constantly‐changing phenomenon of private tutoring. Finally, the article discusses whether, and to what extent, the existence of regulatory mechanisms influences the scope, nature, and implications of private tutoring across the countries of Eastern Europe and Central Asia.View full textDownload full textKeywordsprivate tutoring, post‐socialist transformations, Eastern Europe, Central AsiaRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03057920903361926
机译:自1990年代初期社会主义阵营垮台以来,私人补习在东欧和中亚变得越来越明显。然而,该地区的政策制定者仍未注意到私人补习的这种前所未有的增长,其形式和安排多种多样。基于对12个国家/地区私人补习的跨国研究数据,这项探索性研究探讨了驱动私人补习需求的因素,并讨论了阿塞拜疆,波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那,克罗地亚,格鲁吉亚,立陶宛,蒙古政府对私人补习的反应,波兰,斯洛伐克和乌克兰(2004-2005年进行的研究)以及哈萨克斯坦,吉尔吉斯斯坦和塔吉克斯坦(2005-2006年进行的研究)。本文分析了各种政策背景,并考察了教育利益相关者和政策制定者在制定应对迅速,不断变化和不断变化的私人补习现象的应对措施时所面临的挑战。最后,本文讨论了监管机制的存在是否以及在何种程度上影响了东欧和中亚国家间私人补习的范围,性质和影响。查看全文下载全文关键字私人补习,后社会主义转型,东欧,中亚相关的var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra- 4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03057920903361926

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号