...
首页> 外文期刊>Communications >Who's right: The author or the audience? Effects of user comments and ratings on the perception of online science articles
【24h】

Who's right: The author or the audience? Effects of user comments and ratings on the perception of online science articles

机译:谁是对的:作者还是听众?用户评论和评分对在线科学文章感知的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

When laypersons are interested in science-related questions, they frequently visit participatory websites such as science blogs. Typically, articles on these sites are accompanied by user comments or ratings. The present research investigated the effects of different forms of user feedback on readers' interpretation of science topics. In two experiments (N = 178), participants read a onesided blog article about the dangers of violent video games. The visible user reactions contradicted the slant of the article and were systematically varied (argumentative comments vs. subjective comments vs. ratings vs. none). Results of Study 1 showed that parents (for whom the topic is relevant) made use of comments and ratings to infer the opinion climate, while there were only limited effects on readers' attitudes. Less involved readers (student participants in Study 2), in contrast, were susceptible to the persuasive influence of user comments. Implications regarding the role of user reactions in online science communication are discussed.
机译:当外行人对与科学有关的问题感兴趣时,他们会经常访问参与性网站,例如科学博客。通常,这些网站上的文章会附带用户评论或评分。本研究调查了不同形式的用户反馈对读者对科学主题的解释的影响。在两个实验(N = 178)中,参与者阅读了一篇有关暴力视频游戏的危害的博客文章。可见的用户反应与文章的偏向矛盾,并且系统地进行了变化(议论性评论,主观评论,评级和无)。研究1的结果表明,父母(与该主题相关的父母)利用评论和评分来推断意见氛围,而对读者态度的影响有限。相反,较少参与的读者(研究2的学生)容易受到用户评论的说服力影响。讨论了有关用户反应在在线科学交流中的作用的含义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号