首页> 外文期刊>The communication review >THE ROAD NOT TAKEN: WILLIAM JAMES'S RADICAL EMPIRICISM AND COMMUNICATION THEORY
【24h】

THE ROAD NOT TAKEN: WILLIAM JAMES'S RADICAL EMPIRICISM AND COMMUNICATION THEORY

机译:没走的路:威廉·詹姆斯的激进经验主义和传播理论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This essay examines how William James's radical empiricism deals with indeterminism and formulates a central issue in contemporary communication theory; incommensurability. A close textual reading of James's initial approach of indeterminacy as chaos is provided and I argue James subsequently reformulates this as the problem of incommensurability in his radical empiricism. In this way, James overcomes a chaos/order dualism that continues to orient much communication theory. I examine three post-positivist theories of communication — Pearce & Cronen's Coordinated Management of Meaning, Habermas's Theory of Communicative Action, and Mosco's Political Economy of Communication - in light of this finding and consider its implications for pragmatist projects in communication. It is suggested that although John Durham Peters's Speaking into the Air anticipates many of these findings, recovering James's radical empiricism can facilitate the reconstruction of a pragmatist tradition of thougt subsequently developed through George Herbert Mead and John Dewey.
机译:本文探讨了威廉·詹姆斯的激进经验主义如何处理不确定性,并提出了当代传播理论的核心问题。不可通约性。提供了对詹姆斯​​最初的不确定性最初方法的近距离文字阅读,我认为詹姆斯随后将其重新表述为他的激进经验主义中的不可通约性问题。通过这种方式,詹姆斯克服了混乱/秩序的二元论,这种二元论继续主导着许多传播理论。根据这一发现,我考察了三种后实证主义的传播理论—皮尔斯和克罗宁的意义协调管理,哈贝马斯的传播行为理论和莫斯科的传播政治经济学,并考虑了其对实用主义传播项目的意义。有人建议,尽管约翰·达勒姆·彼得斯(John Durham Peters)的《对空讲话》(Speaking in Air)可以预见许多发现,但恢复詹姆斯的激进经验主义可以促进重建后来通过乔治·赫伯特·米德(George Herbert Mead)和约翰·杜威(John Dewey)发展的实用主义传统。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号