...
首页> 外文期刊>Cognitive Therapy and Research >Dysphoria and the Immediate Interpretation of Ambiguity: Evidence for a Negative Interpretive Bias in Error Rates But Not Response Latencies
【24h】

Dysphoria and the Immediate Interpretation of Ambiguity: Evidence for a Negative Interpretive Bias in Error Rates But Not Response Latencies

机译:烦躁和歧义的立即解释:错误率出现负性解释偏见的证据,但反应潜伏期却没有

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Cognitive theories of depression (Beck, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy: An International Quarterly. 1:5–37, 1987) predict that depressed individuals will have an increased tendency to interpret ambiguous information in a negative manner. Researchers have observed a negative interpretive bias in a variety of situations, but much of the evidence has come from studies that relied on participants’ self-reports and other tasks that are highly susceptible to response biases. Studies that have used semantic priming tasks to covertly probe participants’ immediate interpretations of ambiguity, and thereby avoid response biases, have not observed an interpretive bias (Lawson and MacLeod, Behaviour Research and Therapy. 37:463–474, 1999; Bisson and Sears, Cognition and Emotion. 21:614–645, 2007). The present study used a task better suited to measure interpretive biases in the immediate interpretation of ambiguity: the semantic relatedness decision task. Participants listened to self-referent ambiguous prime sentences (e.g., My boyfriend said that I am unlike his past girlfriends) and responded to visually presented target words related to a negative (jealous), positive (attractive), or neutral (relationship) interpretation of the sentence. The task was to quickly indicate whether or not the target was related to the ambiguous prime (a yes or no response). The expectation was that dysphoric participants would respond more quickly to targets related to the negative interpretations of the primes because they would be more likely to impose negative interpretations on the ambiguity. This was not the case. On the other hand, the error data revealed that dysphoric participants made fewer errors to targets related to the negative interpretations of the primes (i.e., fewer “no” responses to negatively-related targets) and made more errors to targets related to the positive interpretations of the primes, a pattern consistent with a negative interpretive bias. These findings demonstrate that the semantic relatedness task is a promising tool for the study of interpretive biases in dysphoria and depression.
机译:抑郁症的认知理论(贝克,《认知心理治疗杂志》:国际季刊,1987年1:5-37)预测,抑郁症患者将越来越倾向于以消极的方式解释歧义信息。研究人员观察到了在各种情况下的负面解释偏见,但是许多证据来自依赖于参与者的自我报告和其他容易受到回应偏见影响的任务的研究。使用语义启动任务秘密调查参与者对歧义性的即时解释并从而避免响应偏差的研究尚未观察到解释性偏差(Lawson和MacLeod,行为研究与治疗。37:463-474,1999; Bisson和Sears ,认知与情感。21:614–645,2007)。本研究使用的任务更适合在歧义的即时解释中测量解释偏差:语义相关性决策任务。参加者听取了自指的模棱两可的主要句子(例如,我的男朋友说我不像他过去的女友),并对与否定(嫉妒),积极(吸引人)或中性(关系)解释相关的视觉呈现的目标词做出了回应这句话。任务是迅速指出目标是否与模棱两可的素数有关(是或否)。期望烦躁不安的参与者对与素数的否定解释有关的目标做出更快的反应,因为他们更有可能对歧义施加否定的解释。此情况并非如此。另一方面,错误数据显示,烦躁不安的参与者对与素数的否定解释相关的目标犯下的错误更少(即,对负相关目标的“否”响应更少),而对与积极解释相关的目标的犯错更多素数,与否定性解释偏差一致的模式。这些发现表明,语义相关性任务是研究烦躁和抑郁中的解释性偏见的有前途的工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号