首页> 外文期刊>Cognitive linguistics >A constructional analysis of English un-participle constructions
【24h】

A constructional analysis of English un-participle constructions

机译:英语非分词构造的结构分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The present paper reports on an investigation into an English un-participle pattern that is called unpassive, or is described as an adjectival passive. The main characteristic of the pattern is an (adjectival) past participle prefixed by un-, which is used as a predicative complement to a verb. Besides the different terms used for the pattern, there is also some indeterminacy with respect to its particular form. All of the descriptions focus on the verb BE, but mention is also made of GO and REMAIN. That is, the specifications of the pattern's formal side differ to some extent. To provide information on this issue and to get hold of potential (verb-related) differences in the pattern's function, we conducted an empirical analysis from a usage-based construction grammar perspective. Our focus is on the form-function interplay of the pattern in order to gain information about its constructional status and its exact formal and semantic make-up. The database selected for this study is the BNC, from which all occurrences of 'verb plus un-participle' were extracted. The data were submitted to collexeme and covarying collexeme analyses to identify the spectrum of meanings/functions associated with these forms, and distinctive collexeme analyses were carried out to see whether the un-participles found pattern differently with the individual verbs. The results indicate that, on closer examination, the un-participle construction does not represent a homogeneous category, but must be seen as a schematic template of related, though different, usage events that may have expanded analogously from a prototype construction. On the basis of our analyses and informed by findings from developmental studies, we suggest that the related constructions form a network.
机译:本文报道了对英语非分词模式的调查,该模式称为非被动或被描述为形容词被动。模式的主要特征是一个(形容词)过去分词,以un-为前缀,用作动词的谓语补语。除了用于该模式的不同术语外,关于其特定形式还存在一些不确定性。所有描述都集中在动词BE上,但同时也提到了GO和REMAIN。也就是说,图案形式方面的规范有所不同。为了提供有关此问题的信息并掌握模式功能中潜在的(与动词相关的)差异,我们从基于用法的构造语法角度进行了实证分析。我们的重点是模式的形式功能相互作用,以获取有关其构造状态以及确切的形式和语义构成的信息。本研究选择的数据库是BNC,从中提取所有出现的“动词加非分词”。将数据提交给collexeme和可变collexeme分析,以识别与这些形式相关的意义/功能范围,并进行独特的collexeme分析,以查看非分词所发现的模式与各个动词是否不同。结果表明,仔细检查后,非分词构造并不代表同质类别,而必须视为相关(虽然不同)使用事件的示意图模板,这些事件可能已从原型构造中扩展而来。根据我们的分析并从发展研究的发现中获悉,我们建议相关的结构形成一个网络。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号