...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Oral Investigations >Comparative investigations on the efficacy of articaine 4% (epinephrine 1:200,000) and articaine 2% (epinephrine 1:200,000) in local infiltration anaesthesia in dentistry—a randomised double-blind study
【24h】

Comparative investigations on the efficacy of articaine 4% (epinephrine 1:200,000) and articaine 2% (epinephrine 1:200,000) in local infiltration anaesthesia in dentistry—a randomised double-blind study

机译:牙科局部浸润麻醉中4%青蒿素(肾上腺素1:200,000)和2%青蒿素(肾上腺素1:200,000)疗效的比较研究-一项随机双盲研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A randomised double-blind study investigated 155 patients with tooth extractions in the mandibular and maxillary jaws for a loss of anaesthetic potency when reducing the concentration of the active in articaine solutions. Tests were performed on the preparations of articaine 4% with a 1:200,000 addition of epinephrine (Ultracain D-S) and articaine 2% with a 1:200,000 addition of epinephrine (Ultracain 2%-Suprarenin). Local infiltration anaesthesia was the chosen method of anaesthesia. The most noticeable difference observed between the two injection solutions concerned the duration of anaesthesia, which was significantly shortened under the low-dose solution. The 4% articaine solution did not prove superior in local anaesthetic effect. Articaine 2% with epinephrine 1:200,000, therefore, can be considered a suitable local anaesthetic for tooth extractions.
机译:一项随机双盲研究调查了155例下颌和上颌颌牙拔牙患者在降低阿替卡因溶液中活性成分的浓度时麻醉效能的下降。对添加了1:200,000的肾上腺素(Ultracain D-S)的4%青ica碱和添加了1:200,000的肾上腺素(Ultracain 2%上肾上腺素)的2%青ica碱的制剂进行了测试。局部浸润麻醉是麻醉的选择方法。两种注射液之间观察到的最明显差异与麻醉时间有关,在低剂量溶液中麻醉时间明显缩短。 4%的青蒿素溶液在局部麻醉效果上没有优势。因此,2%的甲骨胺和1:200,000的肾上腺素被认为是适合拔牙的局部麻醉剂。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号