首页> 外文期刊>The Clinical Neuropsychologist >Relationship between suboptimal cognitive effort and the clinical scales of the Personality Assessment Inventory
【24h】

Relationship between suboptimal cognitive effort and the clinical scales of the Personality Assessment Inventory

机译:次佳认知努力与人格评估量表的临床量表之间的关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Little research has examined the relationship between the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) and cognitive effort. The current study extends the research on personality assessment and suboptimal cognitive effort by evaluating the relationship between the PAI clinical scales and the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM) in a neuropsychological population. Utilizing corrections for multiple comparisons, rank-order correlations with the TOMM Trial 2 (T2) and the PAI clinical scales indicated a significant relationship with the SOM (rho = −.26, p 87) had adequate sensitivity (93%) and specificity (76%) in predicting TOMM performance, with a positive predictive power of 54% and a negative predictive power of 97%, resulting in a 91% correct classification rate. Thus, the evidence suggests that extreme scores on SOM should prompt careful evaluation for suboptimal cognitive effort.
机译:很少有研究检查人格评估量表(PAI)与认知努力之间的关系。当前的研究通过评估PAI临床量表与神经心理学人群的记忆障碍检测(TOMM)之间的关系,扩展了人格评估和非最佳认知努力的研究。利用校正的多重比较,与TOMM试验2(T2)和PAI临床量表的等级相关性表明与SOM有显着关系(rho = ho.26,第87页)具有足够的敏感性(93%)和特异性(76%)预测TOMM表现,阳性预测力为54%,阴性预测力为97%,正确分类率为91%。因此,有证据表明,SOM的极高分数应促使对不理想的认知努力进行仔细评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号