首页> 外文期刊>Clinical governance >The safety and effectiveness of different methods of earwax removal: a systematic review and economic evaluation
【24h】

The safety and effectiveness of different methods of earwax removal: a systematic review and economic evaluation

机译:不同的耳垢清除方法的安全性和有效性:系统评价和经济评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The systematic review of clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness found limited good-quality evidence, making it difficult to differentiate between the various methods for removing earwax in terms of clearing wax, improving quality of life and satisfaction, AEs or cost-effectiveness. Although it showed that softeners have an effect in clearing earwax in their own right and as precursors to irrigation, which specific softeners have an effect remains uncertain. Evidence on the effectiveness of methods of irrigation or mechanical removal was equivocal. The limited evidence on benefits and costs of methods of earwax removal meant that the economic evaluation was speculative and for illustration only. Its findings should not be used for policy decisions. As such, further research is required to improve the evidence base.
机译:对临床有效性和成本效益的系统评价发现有限的优质证据,因此就清除蜡,改善生活质量和满意度,不良事件或成本效益而言,很难区分各种去除耳垢的方法。尽管表明软化剂本身可以起到清除耳垢的作用,并且可以作为灌溉的前兆,但具体的软化剂是否有效果尚不确定。关于灌溉或机械清除方法有效性的证据是模棱两可的。关于去除耳垢方法的收益和成本的证据有限,这意味着经济评估只是推测性的,仅供说明。其发现不应用于政策决策。因此,需要进一步的研究来改善证据基础。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Clinical governance》 |2010年第4期|p.306-309|共4页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号