首页> 外文期刊>Climate Policy >Equity, climate justice and fossil fuel extraction: principles for a managed phase out
【24h】

Equity, climate justice and fossil fuel extraction: principles for a managed phase out

机译:股权,气候司法和化石燃料提取:管理阶段的原则

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Equity issues have long been debated within international climate politics, focused on fairly distributing reductions in territorial emissions and fossil fuel consumption. There is a growing recognition among scholars and policymakers that curbing fossil fuel supply (as well as demand) can be a valuable part of the climate policy toolbox; this raises the question of where and how the tool should be applied. This paper explores how to equitably manage the social dimensions of a rapid transition away from fossil fuel extraction. Fossil fuel extraction leads to benefits for some people (such as extraction workers) and harms for others (such as pollution-affected communities). A transition must respect and uphold the rights of both groups, while also staying within climate limits, as climate impacts will fall most heavily on the world's poor. This paper begins by reviewing how extraction affects economies and communities and the different transitional challenges they face. Based on that review, it then examines three common equity approaches - economic efficiency, meeting development needs, and effort-sharing. Drawing lessons from the strengths and weaknesses of these approaches, the paper proposes five principles as a basis for equitably curbing fossil fuel extraction within climate limits: (1) Phase out global extraction at pace consistent with limiting warming to 1.5 degrees C; (2) Enable a just transition for workers and communities; (3) Curb extraction consistent with environmental justice; (4) Reduce extraction fastest where doing so will have the least social costs; (5) Share transition costs fairly, according to ability to bear those costs.Key policy insights: Fossil fuel extraction is unlikely to be a viable path to development because the Paris Agreement goals require most fossil fuel use to be ended within a generation; Extraction should be phased out fastest in diversified, wealthier economies that can better absorb the transitional impacts; Governments of extracting countries should enact ambitious industrial policy to diversify their economies, alongside economic and employment policies to enable a just transition; The costs of a just transition should be borne by those most able to bear it: poorer countries can reasonably demand financial support.
机译:股权问题长期以来一直在国际气候政治中辩论,重点是在领土排放和化石燃料消耗中公布分散。学者和政策制定者之间存在越来越高的认可,遏制化石燃料供应(以及需求)可以是气候政策工具箱的有价值的部分;这提出了应该应用工具的帖子和方式。本文探讨了如何公平地管理远离化石燃料提取的快速过渡的社会方面。化石燃料提取导致某些人(如提取工人)的益处,并为他人(如污染影响社区)造成伤害。过渡必须尊重和维护两组的权利,同时也留在气候极限中,因为气候影响将大量占据世界贫困人口。本文首先审查提取对经济和社区的影响以及他们面临的不同过渡挑战。基于该审查,它将审查三种普通股权方法 - 经济效益,会议,发展需求以及努力分享。从这些方法的优势和弱点绘制课程,该论文提出了五个原则作为公平地遏制气候限制中的化石燃料提取的基础:(1)在节奏中逐步逐步淘汰,与1.5摄氏度的限制保持一致; (2)为工人和社区提供刚过渡; (3)遏制提取与环境正义一致; (4)减少提取最快的地方会有最不重要的社会成本; (5)根据承担这些费用的能力,公平地股票成本.Key政策见解:化石燃料提取不太可能成为发展的可行途径,因为巴黎协议目标要求大多数化石燃料用于在一代内结束;提取应在多样化,富裕经济体中逐步排除,可以更好地吸收过渡性影响;提取国家的政府应制定雄心勃勃的产业政策,使其经济和就业政策以及刚刚过渡的经济和就业政策多样化;刚过渡的成本应该由最能够承担的人承担:较贫穷的国家可以合理地要求财政支持。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号