首页> 外文期刊>Climate Policy >Engineering climate debt: temperature overshoot and peak-shaving as risky subprime mortgage lending
【24h】

Engineering climate debt: temperature overshoot and peak-shaving as risky subprime mortgage lending

机译:工程气候债务:作为风险次级抵押贷款的温度超调和波动最大

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Despite the ambitious temperature goal of the 2015 Paris Agreement, the pace of reducing global CO2 emissions remains sluggish. This creates conditions in which the idea of temperature 'overshoot and peak-shaving' is emerging as a possible strategy to meet the Paris goal. An overshoot and peak-shaving scenario rests upon the 'temporary' use of speculative solar radiation management (SRM) technologies combined with large-scale carbon dioxide removal (CDR). Whilst some view optimistically the strategic interdependence between SRM and CDR, we argue that this strategy comes with a risk of escalating 'climate debt'. We explain our position using the logic of debt and the analogy of subprime mortgage lending. In overshoot and peak-shaving scenarios, the role of CDR and SRM is to compensate for delayed mitigation, placing the world in a double debt: 'emissions debt' and 'temperature debt'. Analogously, this can be understood as a combination of 'subprime mortgage' (i.e. large-scale CDR) and 'home-equity-line-of-credit' (i.e. temporary SRM). With this analogy, we draw some important lessons from the 2007-2009 US subprime mortgage crisis. The analogy signals that the efficacy of temporary SRM cannot be evaluated in isolation of the feasibility of large-scale CDR and that the failure of the overshoot promise will lead to prolonged peak-shaving, masking an ever-rising climate debt. Overshoot and peak-shaving scenarios should not be presented as a secured feasible investment, but rather as a high-risk speculation betting on insecure promises. Obscuring the riskiness of such scenarios is a precipitous step towards escalating a climate debt crisis. Key policy insights The slow progress of mitigation increases the attraction of an 'overshoot and peak-shaving' scenario which combines temporary SRM with large-scale CDR Following the logic of debt, the role of CDR and SRM in this scenario is to compensate for delayed mitigation, creating a double debt of CO2 emissions and global temperature Using the analogy of subprime lending, this strategy can be seen as offering a combination of subprime mortgage and open-ended 'line-of-credit' Because the 'success' of peak-shaving by temporary SRM hinges critically on the overshoot promise of large-scale CDR, SRM and CDR should not be discussed separately
机译:尽管2015年《巴黎协定》设定了宏伟的温度目标,但减少全球CO2排放的步伐仍然缓慢。这创造了条件,在这种条件下,温度“超调和调峰”的想法逐渐成为实现巴黎目标的可能策略。超调和调峰的场景取决于投机性太阳辐射管理(SRM)技术与大规模二氧化碳清除(CDR)结合的“临时”使用。尽管有些人乐观地认为SRM和CDR之间的战略相互依存关系,但我们认为,此战略存在“气候债务”升级的风险。我们使用债务逻辑和次级抵押贷款的类比来解释我们的立场。在过冲和削峰的情况下,CDR和SRM的作用是补偿延迟的缓解,使世界陷入双重债务:“排放债务”和“温度债务”。类似地,这可以理解为“次级抵押”(即大规模CDR)和“房屋净值信贷额度”(即临时SRM)的组合。以此类推,我们从2007年至2009年美国次贷危机中吸取了一些重要的教训。该类比信号表明,不能孤立于大规模CDR的可行性来评估临时SRM的功效,并且过冲承诺的失败将导致长时间的削峰,从而掩盖了不断上升的气候债务。过冲和削峰情景不应该作为有保证的可行投资而提出,而应作为押在不可靠诺言上的高风险投机。掩盖此类情况的风险是朝着逐步升级气候债务危机迈出的重要一步。主要政策见解缓解措施的缓慢进展增加了“过冲和削峰”方案的吸引力,该方案将临时SRM与大规模CDR结合在一起遵循债务逻辑,CDR和SRM在此方案中的作用是补偿延迟减缓气候变化,造成二氧化碳排放量和全球温度的双重负担使用次级抵押贷款的类比,该策略可被视为提供次级抵押贷款和开放式“信用额度”的组合,因为峰值的“成功”临时SRM刮胡子关键取决于大型CDR的超调前景,不应单独讨论SRM和CDR

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号