...
【24h】

Quality Is King

机译:质量为王

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Ciwm's Quality is King seminar held in December last year taught me, once again, that just as you think you have a handle on what seems to be a basic waste principle, it turns out to be more complex and challenging. I thought the quality recycling debate was reasonably straightforward: collect as much as you can, meet your targets, ensure there is a market for the collected material and keep it as clean and uncontaminated as possible to generate a high price. While that remains the basic concept there are, of course, a lot more factors at work. Starting at the collection point, the method employed can have a dramatic effect on quality. The commingled against kerbside sort argument isn't going away and is either the problem or the solution, depending on experiences. A headlong drive to meet weight-based recycling targets may leave us with plenty of glass and organics, but of low or limited market value.
机译:去年12月举行的Ciwm的质量为王研讨会再次告诉我,就像您认为掌握了基本的浪费原则一样,事实却变得更加复杂和具有挑战性。我认为质量回收辩论是相当直接的:尽可能多地收集,达到目标,确保所收集材料有市场,并保持其尽可能干净和无污染,以产生高价。尽管这仍然是基本概念,但仍有许多因素在起作用。从收集点开始,所采用的方法会对质量产生重大影响。混合使用路边排序参数并不会消失,它是问题还是解决方案,取决于经验。努力实现基于重量的回收目标可能会给我们留下大量的玻璃和有机物,但市场价值较低或有限。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Wastes Management 》 |2011年第1期| p.14| 共1页
  • 作者

    Chris Murphy;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号