首页> 外文期刊>City >The Production of Shared Space in Northern Ireland. Part 1: Introduction: Beyond the divided city: policies and practices of shared space
【24h】

The Production of Shared Space in Northern Ireland. Part 1: Introduction: Beyond the divided city: policies and practices of shared space

机译:北爱尔兰共享空间的生产。第1部分:简介:超越分裂的城市:共享空间的政策和实践

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The papers in this special feature address the question of 'shared space'-a concept that was introduced in urban policy discourse and practice of conflict transformation in Northern Ireland nearly a decade ago (e.g. OFMDFM 2005). Debates around the definition and use of this concept in the context of a 'post-conflict' society, though evolving over the years, have generally built upon an interest in the role of public space as a social resource that pervaded think tank, government and public agency reports in the UK during the first decade of this century (Lownsbrough and Beunderman 2007; JRF 2007). Those documents emphasised the importance of public spaces in successful regeneration policies, in the creation of sustainable and cohesive communities, and in fostering interaction and cohesion across lines of ethnic and cultural diversity. They discussed the conditions for the workability of public spaces (e.g. how well they can be made to resonate with everyday life routines and to accommodate wider definitions of community) and in doing so engaged with issues pertinent to, albeit not specifically focused upon, the practices of peace building in Northern Ireland. As the papers in this special feature suggest, however, understandings and policies for sharing space in Northern Ireland have remained rather vague, practised reductively and understood as broadly referring to the ability of people from different ethno-national communities to access and use the same physical spaces.
机译:这个特殊功能的论文解决了``共享空间''的问题-这个概念在近十年前的北爱尔兰城市政策讨论和冲突转变实践中被引入(例如OFMDFM 2005)。关于“冲突后”社会的定义和使用的争论尽管经过了多年的发展,但一般都基于对公共空间作为遍布智囊团,政府和政府的社会资源的作用的兴趣。公共机构在本世纪头十年在英国进行报道(Lownsbrough and Beunderman 2007; JRF 2007)。这些文件强调了公共空间在成功的复兴政策,创建可持续和凝聚力社区以及促进种族和文化多样性之间的互动和凝聚力方面的重要性。他们讨论了公共空间可操作性的条件(例如,如何使它们与日常生活的常规产生共鸣并适应社区的更广泛定义),并在此过程中探讨与实践有关的问题,尽管并非专门针对这些实践。爱尔兰的和平建设的标志。但是,正如该专题文章中所暗示的那样,北爱尔兰共享空间的理解和政策仍然含糊不清,经过还原性实践,被广泛理解为来自不同民族社区的人们访问和使用相同物质的能力。空格。

著录项

  • 来源
    《City》 |2014年第5期|427-431|共5页
  • 作者

    Milena Komarova; Dominic Bryan;

  • 作者单位

    Institute for the Study of Conflict Transformation and Social Justice, Queen's University Belfast;

    Institute for Irish Studies, Queen's University Belfast;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号