...
首页> 外文期刊>Cities >Poverty incidence and concentration in different social groups in urban China, a case study of Nanjing
【24h】

Poverty incidence and concentration in different social groups in urban China, a case study of Nanjing

机译:中国城市不同社会群体的贫困发生率和集中度-以南京为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Based on a large-scale household survey conducted in Nanjing in 2005, this study aims to provide a better understanding of poverty incidence in a contemporary Chinese city, as well as poverty concentration in different social groups. This study reveals a much higher and more realistic poverty incidence among working urban residents, unemployed/laid-off urban residents and rural migrants than the official statistics suggest. To understand poverty concentration in different social groups, the 1370 cases are classified into various categories by hukou status, number of unemployed family members, age, educational attainment and occupation of the head of the household as well as housing tenure. These groups are further categorized into urban households without unemployed, urban households with unemployed, and rural migrants. We compared three types of poverty measures (i.e. FGT indices, the sense of deprivation, and MLSS coverage rate), are compared across different social groups to show different patterns of poverty concentration, in particular the variation in three types of households. This study has multiple policy implications for alleviating poverty in urban China. First, it identifies a huge gap in the existing social safety net. Second, it recognizes several social groups that endure multiple disadvantages and several groups that are unprotected by a social safety net. Third, it confirms the enduring and widening urban-rural division, and suggests that rural migrants remain outside the urban society in terms of both living conditions and social welfare provision.
机译:基于2005年在南京进行的大规模家庭调查,该研究旨在更好地了解当代中国城市的贫困发生率以及不同社会群体的贫困集中度。这项研究表明,在职城市居民,失业/下岗城市居民和农村移民中的贫困发生率比官方统计数字高得多,而且更为现实。为了了解贫困人口在不同社会群体中的集中情况,根据户籍状况,失业家庭成员的数量,年龄,受教育程度和户主的职业以及住房任期将1370个案例分为不同类别。这些群体进一步分类为没有失业的城市家庭,有失业的城市家庭和农村移民。我们比较了三种类型的贫困衡量标准(即FGT指数,贫困感和MLSS覆盖率),以比较不同社会群体的贫困集中度模式,尤其是三种类型家庭的差异。这项研究对缓解中国城市贫困具有多重政策意义。首先,它确定了现有社会安全网中的巨大差距。其次,它承认几个遭受多重不利影响的社会群体和几个不受社会安全网保护的群体。第三,它确认了城乡分割的持久性和扩大性,并建议农村移民在生活条件和社会福利提供方面都处于城市社会之外。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号