首页> 外文期刊>Cities >The 'Collaborative Planning Turn' in China: Exploring three decades of diffusion, interpretation and reception in Chinese planning
【24h】

The 'Collaborative Planning Turn' in China: Exploring three decades of diffusion, interpretation and reception in Chinese planning

机译:中国的“协作规划转向”:中国规划中探索三十年的扩散,解释和接待

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The collaborative planning idea (CPI) received wide attention from Chinese academics and planners when it was introduced in the late 1990s. The ongoing socio-economic transition in China has provided a fertile ground to accept, accommodate and develop CPI, exemplifying a transnational flow of planning ideas from the Anglosphere towards the non-English-speaking world. While the reception of CPI in China initiated three decades ago, the diffusion, interpretation, reception, and impacts of it are as yet understudied. To fill this gap, this article adopts a three-part step analysis: diffusion, interpretation and reception (in practice). Though inspired by Western scholars such as Healey and Innes, Chinese scholars may also be influenced by the unique governance context of China, as well as their own research backgrounds and interests, as they seek to (re)conceptualise CPI within a Chinese context, and therefore, specific interpretations of CPI in China mark distinctions from original works (e. g. mixing up collaborative planning and communicative planning and over-emphasising public participation). In practice, CPI is more operational at the macro- and micro-level non-statutory planning rather than meso-level statutory planning. However, recent attempts have been made to institutionalise CPI and facilitate the potential of extending the collaborative approach into statutory planning or beyond the realm of traditional planning.
机译:在20世纪90年代后期介绍时,协作规划的想法(CPI)在中国学术界和规划者中得到了广泛的关注。中国正在进行的社会经济转型为接受,容纳和开发CPI提供了一种肥沃的基础,示出了从盎格圈朝向非英语世界的跨国流动。虽然三十年前中国的CPI接收到,但尚未解读它的扩散,解释,接待和影响。为了填补这一差距,本文采用三部分步骤分析:扩散,解释和接待(在实践中)。虽然受到希尔利和旅馆等西方学者的启发,但中国学者也可能受到中国独特治理背景的影响,以及他们自己的研究背景和利益,因为他们在中国背景中寻求(重新)概念性CPI,以及因此,对中国CPI的具体解释标志着原始工程的区别(例如混合协作规划和交际规划以及过度强调公众参与)。在实践中,CPI在宏观和微级非法定规划中更具运作,而不是中间级法定规划。然而,最近的尝试已经制定了CPI,并促进了将合作方法扩展到法定规划或超出传统规划领域的潜力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号