...
首页> 外文期刊>Chinese Medical Sciences Journal >INITIAL COMPARISON OF INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM EMBOLIZATION WITH MECHANICAL DETACHABLE SPIRALS AND WITH GUGLIELMI DETACHABLE COILS
【24h】

INITIAL COMPARISON OF INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM EMBOLIZATION WITH MECHANICAL DETACHABLE SPIRALS AND WITH GUGLIELMI DETACHABLE COILS

机译:机械可分离螺旋体与古列里密可分离线圈的颅内动脉瘤化的初始比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective. To compare the embolization effects of intracranial aneurysms with mechanical detachable spirals (MDS) and with Guglielmi detachable coils (GDC). Methods. One hundred and twenty cases with 125 intracranial aneurysms were embolized in Beijing Hospital from March 1995 to July 1999. Sixty - six aneurysms in 64 cases were embolized with MDS, 51 in 48 with GDC, and 8 in 8 with both MDS and GDC. Clinical data including sex, age, subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), Hunt & Hess grading, diameter and neck width of aneurysms, number and length of coils used per aneurysm, occlusive ratio, and complications were compared between MDS and GDC groups. Results. MDS and GDC groups were comparable (t-test or χ~2 -test, all P value > 0. 10) in terms of age, sex, diameter of aneurysms [ (8. 46 +- 3. 42) mm vs. (7. 38 +- 3. 45) mm], neck width [ (3. 49 +- 1. 50) mm vs. (3. 26 +- 1. 52) mm], coils number[(4. 65 +- 3. 01 ) vs. (4. 24 +- 2. 65)] and their length[(460. 2 +- 398. 5) mm vs. (422. 9 +- 387. 1) mm] used per aneurysm, occlusive ratio in aneurysms embolized ≥ 80% [(95.00% +-6. 32% ) vs. (94. 19% +- 7. 63% )], mortality and permanent complications (7. 8% vs. 4. 2% ). Conclusions. MDS and GDC are all materials for embolization of intracranial aneurysms. MDS is less expensive, but more difficult to control and of propensity to complications while GDC is more compliant, easier to be used, safer, and have many alternative types for use as well as more extensive indications.
机译:目的。比较颅内动脉瘤与机械可分离螺旋管(MDS)和古列尔米可分离螺旋管(GDC)的栓塞效果。方法。从1995年3月至1999年7月,在北京医院栓塞了120例颅内动脉瘤125例。其中64例MDS栓塞了66例动脉瘤,GDC 48栓塞了51例,MDS和GDC栓塞了8例中的8例。比较了MDS和GDC组的临床数据,包括性别,年龄,蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH),Hunt&Hess分级,动脉瘤的直径和颈部宽度,每个动脉瘤使用的线圈数量和长度,闭塞率以及并发症。结果。 MDS和GDC组在年龄,性别,动脉瘤直径[(8. 46±3. 42)mm vs.(t-检验或χ〜2-检验,所有P值均> 0. 10)方面具有可比性。 7. 38 +-3. 45)mm],颈部宽度[(3. 49 +-1. 50)mm vs.(3. 26 +-1. 52)mm],线圈数[(4. 65 +- 3. 01)vs.(4. 24 +-2. 65)]和它们的长度[(460. 2 +-398. 5)mm vs.(422. 9 +-387. 1)mm],栓塞的动脉瘤闭塞率≥80%[(95.00%+ -6。32%)vs.(94. 19%+-7. 63%)],死亡率和永久性并发症(7. 8%vs. 4. 2% )。结论。 MDS和GDC都是栓塞颅内动脉瘤的材料。 MDS较便宜,但更难以控制,更易出现并发症,而GDC更合规,更易于使用,更安全,并且具有许多可供选择的使用类型以及更广泛的适应症。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号