首页> 外文期刊>中国医学科学杂志(英文版) >INITIAL COMPARISON OF INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM EMBOLIZATION WITH MECHANICAL DETACHABLE SPIRALS AND WITH GUGLIELMI DETACHABLE COILS
【24h】

INITIAL COMPARISON OF INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM EMBOLIZATION WITH MECHANICAL DETACHABLE SPIRALS AND WITH GUGLIELMI DETACHABLE COILS

机译:机械可分离螺旋体与古列里密可分离线圈的颅内动脉瘤化的初始比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objective.To compare the embolization effects of intracranial aneurysms with mechanical detachable spirals(MDS)and with Guglielmi detachable coils(GDC). Methods. One hundred and twenty cases with 125 intracranial aneurysms were embolized in Beijing Hospital from March 1995 to July 1999. Sixty-six aneurysms in 64 cases were embolized with MDS,51 in 48 with GDC,and 8 in 8 with both MDS and GDC.Clinical data including sex,age,subarachnoid hemorrhage(SAH),Hunt & Hess grading,diameter and neck width of aneurysms,number and length of coils used per aneurysm,occlusive ratio,and complications were compared between MDS and GDC groups. Results. MDS and GDC groups were comparable(t-test or χ2 -test,all P value >0.10)in terms of age,sex,diameter of aneurysms[(8.46±3.42)mm vs.(7.38±3.45)mm],neck width[(3.49±1.50)mm vs.(3.26±1.52)mm],coils number[(4.65±3.01)vs.(4.24±2.65)]and their length[(460.2±398.5)mm vs.(422.9±387.1)mm]used per aneurysm,occlusive ratio in aneurysms embolized≥80%[(95.00%±6.32%)vs.(94.19%±7.63%)],mortality and permanent complications(7.8% vs. 4.2%). Conclusions. MDS and GDC are all materials for embolization of intracranial aneurysms. MDS is less expensive,but more difficult to control and of propensity to complications while GDC is more compliant,easier to be used,safer,and have many alternative types for use as well as more extensive indications.
机译:发明目标。与机械可拆卸螺旋(MDS)和Guglielmi可拆卸线圈(GDC)进行比较颅内动脉瘤的栓塞效应。方法。 1995年3月至1999年7月,北京医院栓塞了125例颅内动脉瘤。64例中的66例动脉瘤与MDS,51患者栓塞,51人,GDC,8中8中的MDS和GDC.CLinical包括性,年龄,蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH),捕猎和HESS分级,动脉瘤的直径和颈部宽度,每种动脉瘤使用的线圈,闭塞率和并发症的线圈的数量和长度的数据在MDS和GDC组之间进行了比较。结果。在年龄,性别,动脉瘤的直径方面,MDS和GDC组是可比的(t检验或χ2 - χ2 - 最低,所有P值> 0.10)[(8.46±3.42)mm,颈部宽度[(3.49±1.50)mm,(3.26±1.52)mm],线圈数[(4.65±3.01)与(4.24±2.65)]及其长度[(460.2±398.5)mm,(422.9±387.1) MM]每种动脉瘤使用,动脉瘤中的闭塞率栓塞≥80%[(95.00%±6.32%),死亡率和永久性并发症(7.8%与4.2%)。结论。 MDS和GDC是颅内动脉瘤栓塞的所有材料。 MDS不太昂贵,但更难以控制和对并发症的倾向,而GDC更加符合,更容易使用,更安全,并且具有许多替代类型,以及更广泛的指示。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号