...
首页> 外文期刊>Chinese Medical Journal >Clinical diagnostic approach to severe acute respiratory syndrome: an institution's experience
【24h】

Clinical diagnostic approach to severe acute respiratory syndrome: an institution's experience

机译:严重急性呼吸道综合症的临床诊断方法:机构的经验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Objective To analyze diagnostic approach to severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) according to the diagnostic criteria issued by the Ministry of Health of China (MHC). Methods The clinical data and the diagnostic results of 108 cases of SARS were retrospectively reviewed according to the MHC criteria. Results There were 55 men and 53 women, with a median age of 34. 5 years (range, 12-78 years). The interval between their first visit and clinical diagnosis was 3 days (range, 0-14 days). The diagnosis was made at the first visit in 7 (6.5%, 7/108) cases with a history of exposure to SARS patients and infiltrates on chest radiograph. Eighty-nine (82.4%) and 12 (11.1%) patients were categorized as probable cases and suspected cases respectively at their first visit and a clinical diagnosis of SARS was made subsequently. The interval between first visit and reaching the final diagnosis was 1-3 days in 72 (66.7%) cases and 4 days in 29 (26.9%) cases. The final diagnosis was made in 0-14 days (median, 2 days) for those (n=59, 54.6%) with a history of close contact with SARS patients and 2-8 days (median, 3 days) for those (n=49, 45.4%) living in Beijing but without such a history (P=0.03). The chest radiograph was interpreted as unremarkable in 26 (24.1%) cases at their first visit, and the diagnosis was made in 4 days (range 2-8 days), which was significantly longer compared with other cases (P<0.001). In patients without a history of close contact with SARS patients, all the five criteria were met after combination antibiotic therapy had failed. Conclusions A chest radiograph without infiltrates at the early stage of SARS is an important factor responsible for delayed diagnosis. In patients without a history of close contact with SARS cases, antibiotic effect was a major factor influencing doctors' diagnosis.
机译:目的根据中国卫生部(MHC)发布的诊断标准,分析重症急性呼吸综合征(SARS)的诊断方法。方法根据MHC标准回顾性分析108例SARS的临床资料和诊断结果。结果男55例,女53例,中位年龄34. 5岁(范围12-78岁)。他们首次就诊与临床诊断之间的间隔为3天(范围为0-14天)。首次访视时诊断为7例(6.5%,7/108),有SARS患者和胸部X线片浸润史。初诊时分别将89例(82.4%)和12例(11.1%)分为可疑病例和可疑病例,随后对SARS进行临床诊断。初诊与最终诊断之间的间隔为72天(66.7%)为1-3天,29天(26.9%)为4天。那些与SARS患者有密切接触史的患者(n = 59,54.6%)在0-14天(中位数为2天)做出最终诊断,而对于这些患者(n = 49,45.4%)住在北京,但没有这样的历史(P = 0.03)。初次访视的26例(24.1%)病例中,胸部X线片无明显异常,诊断时间为4天(2-8天),与其他病例相比明显更长(P <0.001)。在没有与SARS患者密切接触史的患者中,联合抗生素治疗失败后,所有五个标准均得到满足。结论SARS早期的X线胸片未见浸润是导致延迟诊断的重要因素。在没有密切接触SARS病史的患者中,抗生素作用是影响医生诊断的主要因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号