...
首页> 外文期刊>Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology >Establishment of Diagnostic Criteria Using EBNA1 IgA Antibody Levels in a High-Risk Area for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
【24h】

Establishment of Diagnostic Criteria Using EBNA1 IgA Antibody Levels in a High-Risk Area for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

机译:使用EBNA1 IgA抗体水平在鼻咽癌高危地区建立诊断标准

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE The EBNA1 IgA antibody level of normal and NPC subjects in a high incidence area were analyzed for new diagnostic criteria to improve diagnosis. METHODS A total of 780 normal and 104 NPC sera were tested for EBNA1 IgA antibody levels by ELISA. Two diagnostic criteria were obtained from sensitivity and specificity data: 1) lower equivocal limit (rOD = 1.10) where sensitivity = 95%; and 2) upper equivocal limit (rOD = 1.85) where specificity = 95%. RESULTS The range and distribution of EBNA1 IgA antibody levels are broad with those of normal subjects (0.093 - 4.726, mean = 0.850 ± 0.637) overlapping those from NPC subjects (0.235 - 3.721, mean = 2.241 ± 0.875). However, NPC subjects did exhibit significantly higher antibody levels (t = 18.5, P < 0.001). Based on the diagnostic criteria, 3 diagnostic categories were established: ① Positive; ② Suspected Positive; and ③ Negative. The percentage of NPC subjects falling into these 3 diagnostic categories were 75.13%, 17.44% and 7.44%, respectively and of normal subjects, 4.81% , 17.31%, 77.88% respectively. CONCLUSION Due to the broad distribution and overlapping of antibody levels between normal and NPC subjects in a high incidence area, it is important to have diagnostic criteria that will categorize those with equivocal results to minimize misdiagnosis. The 3 diagnostic categories established in this study will enhance detection and help physicians in their clinical diagnosis.
机译:目的分析高发地区正常人和NPC受试者的EBNA1 IgA抗体水平,以提高诊断水平。方法ELISA法检测780例正常人和104例NPC血清的EBNA1 IgA抗体水平。从敏感性和特异性数据中获得了两个诊断标准:1)模棱两可的下限(rOD = 1.10),其中敏感性= 95%; 2)明确上限(rOD = 1.85),其中特异性= 95%。结果EBNA1 IgA抗体水平的范围和分布与正常受试者(0.093-4.726,平均值= 0.850±0.637)较宽,而与NPC受试者(0.235-3.721,平均值= 2.241±0.875)重叠。但是,NPC受试者确实表现出明显更高的抗体水平(t = 18.5,P <0.001)。根据诊断标准,建立了3个诊断类别:①阳性; ②怀疑阳性; ③负数。属于这3个诊断类别的NPC受试者的百分比分别为75.13%,17.44%和7.44%,而正常受试者的百分比分别为4.81%,17.31%和77.88%。结论由于高发地区正常人和NPC受试者之间抗体水平的广泛分布和重叠,重要的是要有诊断标准,对那些结果模棱两可的人进行分类,以最大程度地减少误诊。在这项研究中建立的3种诊断类别将增强检测并帮助医生进行临床诊断。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号