...
首页> 外文期刊>Chinese Geographical Science >ALTERNATIVE METHODS FOR CONDUCTING COMPARATIVE ANALYSES OF CADASTRAL SYSTEMS
【24h】

ALTERNATIVE METHODS FOR CONDUCTING COMPARATIVE ANALYSES OF CADASTRAL SYSTEMS

机译:进行地籍系统比较分析的替代方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The conception of an efficient cadastral system is an important element in the development of each country. It is crucial for the efficient operation of the real estate market―the security and liberty of making transactions, registering a property, planning operations, the introduction of an ad valorem tax on property and more rational use of space. In Europe there are different types of cadastral systems, because the countries in Europe have different cultural backgrounds, different economical and social backgrounds. Through the centuries, many types of cadastral systems evolved and their differences often depend upon local cultural heritage, physical geography, land use, technology, etc. Comparative analyses of cadastral systems have been the subjects of many publications and studies in world literature. It was assessed that the useful tools in conducting comparative analyses of various cadastral systems include the procedures of statistical inference. This paper presents the results of a project to compare the performance of ten cadastral systems internationally by creating appropriate integrated indicators of a cadastral system using statistical technique. Such indicators will make it possible to compare different cadastral systems and present them hierarchically in relation to their quality, structure, as well as legal, organizational and technological solutions. From a good number of methods available, techniques originating from two spheres of statistic inference were selected: distribution free methods and multivariate analysis methods. For analyses with the distribution free methods, FRIEDMAN'S test (FRIENDMAN's non-parametric variance analysis) as well as KENDALL's test (KENDALL's compatibility ratio) were selected. For analyses with the multivariate analysis methods, factor analysis was selected.
机译:高效地籍制度的概念是每个国家发展的重要因素。这对于房地产市场的有效运营至关紧要-进行交易,注册财产,计划运营,对财产征收从价税以及更合理地利用空间的安全和自由。在欧洲,地籍系统的类型不同,因为欧洲国家的文化背景不同,经济和社会背景也不同。几个世纪以来,地籍系统的类型不断发展,其差异通常取决于当地的文化遗产,自然地理,土地利用,技术等。地籍系统的比较分析已成为世界文学中许多出版物和研究的主题。据评估,进行各种地籍系统比较分析的有用工具包括统计推断程序。本文介绍了一个项目的结果,该项目通过使用统计技术创建地籍系统的适当综合指标来比较国际上十个地籍系统的性能。这些指标将使比较不同的地籍系统成为可能,并根据其质量,结构以及法律,组织和技术解决方案对它们进行分级显示。从大量可用的方法中,选择了来自两个统计推断领域的技术:无分布方法和多元分析方法。对于使用无分布方法的分析,选择了FRIEDMAN检验(FRIENDMAN的非参数方差分析)以及KENDALL检验(KENDALL的相容率)。对于使用多元分析方法进行的分析,选择了因素分析。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号