首页> 外文期刊>China & World Economy >How Do China's Importing Firms Respond to Non-tariff Measures?
【24h】

How Do China's Importing Firms Respond to Non-tariff Measures?

机译:中国进口公司如何应对非关税措施?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

After the formation of the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 1995, most countries gradually reduced their import tariffs to a fairly low level. However, the reduced tariffs could not be simply read as a reduction in trade barriers. Indeed, many suspect that countries tend to use more non-tariff measures (NTMs), substituting them for tariff barriers, to protect their domestic economies. This paper uses newly compiled and detailed Chinese NTM data, together with highly disaggregated firm import data and manufacturing firm operational data, to investigate the impact of China's import-related NTMs on firm imports. The main empirical results show that, as in the case of tariff barriers, China's trade policy NTMs mainly inhibit firms'intermediate imports. In contrast, China's public policy NTMs significantly improve the intensive and extensive margins of firm's intermediate imports and raise the prices and quality of imported inputs. The greater the extent to which a firm engages in processing trade, the larger is the promoting effect of public policy NTMs on the firm's import margins for intermediate inputs, and the greater is the restricting effect on the prices and the quality of the firm's imported inputs.
机译:在1995年世界贸易组织(WTO)形成后,大多数国家逐渐将其进口关税逐步降至相当低的水平。但是,减少的关税不能简单地阅读作为贸易壁垒的减少。实际上,许多怀疑国家倾向于使用更多的非关税措施(NTMS),将其代替关税壁垒,以保护其国内经济体。本文采用新编译和详细的中国NTM数据,以及高度分列的公司进口数据和制造公司的运营数据,调查中国进口相关的NTMS对公司进口的影响。主要经验结果表明,正如在关税障碍的情况下,中国的贸易政策NTMS主要禁止企业的进口。相比之下,中国的公共政策NTMS显着提高了公司中间进口的密集和广泛利润,提高了进口投入的价格和质量。公司从事加工贸易的程度越大,公共政策NTMS对中级投入的进口利润率的促进效力越大,而且对公司进口投入的价格的限制效果更大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号