...
首页> 外文期刊>Child Care in Practice >Children's Rights and Youth Justice: 20 Years of No Progress
【24h】

Children's Rights and Youth Justice: 20 Years of No Progress

机译:儿童权利与青年司法:20年没有进步

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The adoption of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) in 1989 and its ratification by the UK government two years later came at a time of considerable progress in youth justice. The Convention itself set clear standards of treatment, in terms of both processes and disposals, which appeared at the time to provide positive endorsement of the direction of travel of that period. However, the period since the early 1990s has been one of retrenchment in youth justice, with an increasingly punitive public and political mood being reflected in legislation, policy and practice. Welfare concerns have virtually disappeared from the agenda in England, and although this is not replicated to the same extent in other UK nations, the consequences in terms of outcomes for young people have been highly damaging. This article will consider these developments in light of the standards and requirements set by the UNCRC, considering the extent to which policy and practice have complied with the expectations it establishes. It will focus on a number of developments that have been encapsulated in terms of a “punitive turn”, arguing that neither the rights nor the welfare of young people have been served well by emerging practices. These issues have been the subject of repeatedly expressed concerns by the UN Committee in its periodic reports on UK government performance under the terms of the Convention. The article concludes that youth justice policy and practice in the United Kingdom has largely failed to live up to its international obligations, and that this in turn has created significant problems for children and young people. Some possible steps forward are suggested in order to re-establish the primary principle that children should be guaranteed protection under the Convention, irrespective of their involvement in the justice system.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13575270903369301
机译:1989年通过了《联合国儿童权利公约》,两年后英国政府批准了《联合国儿童权利公约》,这是在青年司法领域取得重大进展的时候。 《公约》本身就处理和处置均设定了明确的待遇标准,当时看来是对该时期旅行方向的积极认可。但是,自1990年代初以来,这一时期一直是青年司法工作的缩水之一,立法,政策和做法反映出越来越严厉的公共和政治情绪。在英国,人们对福利的关注实际上已经从议程中消失了,尽管在其他英国国家中,福利的关注程度没有得到同样的体现,但对年轻人的结果带来的后果却是巨大的。本文将根据UNCRC设定的标准和要求来考虑这些发展,并考虑政策和实践在多大程度上符合其设定的期望。它将重点关注“惩罚性转折”所概括的许多发展,认为新兴实践并没有很好地服务于年轻人的权利和福利。这些问题一直是联合国委员会在其关于《公约》条款下英国政府绩效的定期报告中反复表达的关切。文章的结论是,联合王国的青年司法政策和实践在很大程度上没有履行其国际义务,这反过来给儿童和年轻人造成了重大问题。建议采取一些可能的措施,以重新确立应确保儿童受到《公约》保护的基本原则,而不论其是否参与司法系统。查看全文下载全文相关的var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,services_compact:“ citeulike,网络振动,微博,technorati,美味,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布号:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13575270903369301

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号