...
首页> 外文期刊>Chest >Deep Venous Thrombosis Caused by Femoral Venous Catheters in Critically Ill Adult Patients
【24h】

Deep Venous Thrombosis Caused by Femoral Venous Catheters in Critically Ill Adult Patients

机译:成人重症患者股静脉导管引起的深静脉血栓形成

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Study objectives: To determine the frequency of and potential risk factors for catheter-relatedndeep venous thrombosis (DVT) in critically ill adult patients.nDesign: Prospective, controlled, observational cohort study.nSetting: A mixed medical and surgical ICU in a university hospital.nPatients: All adult patients undergoing femoral vein catheterization.nInterventions: None.nMeasurements: ICU diagnosis, underlying disease, demographic data, type of catheter, compli-ncations during cannulation, use of anticoagulants, coagulation status, medications infused, andnduration of catheterization were recorded. Compression and duplex Doppler ultrasound studiesnof both femoral veins were performed prior to insertion, at 12 h after insertion, and daily untilncatheter removal. Follow-up investigation was performed at 24 h and 1 week after removal.nResults: Of 140 cases entered into the study, 124 were evaluated. Fourteen patients developedniliofemoral vein DVTs. Two were clinically obvious. Twelve (9.6%) were line related (uncannu-nlated leg normal) and two (1.6%) occurred only in the uncannulated leg (p 5 0.011; relative risk,n6.0; confidence interval, 1.5 to 23.5). Line-related DVT can occur any time from the day afterninsertion to 1 week after removal. The incidence of catheter-related DVT was unrelated tonnumber of insertion attempts, arterial puncture or hematoma, duration of catheterization,ncoagulation status, or type of infused medications. No other predisposing or protective factorsnwere identified. Three of the 12 patients with catheter-related DVT died. In no patient wasnclinical pulmonary embolus suspected.nConclusion: Although the femoral route is convenient and has potential advantages, the use ofnfemoral lines increases the risk of iliofemoral DVT. Catheter-related DVT may occur as soon asn1 day after cannulation and is usually asymptomatic. This increased risk should be carefullynconsidered when the femoral route of cannulation is chosen.
机译:研究目标:确定重症成年患者与导管相关的深静脉血栓形成(DVT)的频率和潜在危险因素.n设计:前瞻性,对照,观察性队列研究。环境:大学医院中的医学和外科混合ICU。 n患者:所有接受股静脉插管的成年患者n干预措施:无n测量:记录ICU诊断,基础疾病,人口统计学数据,导管类型,插管过程中的并发症,抗凝剂的使用,凝血状态,输注的药物以及插管的插入情况。在插入前,插入后12 h和每天拔除颈椎者,对两条股静脉进行压缩和双工多普勒超声检查。结果:移除的24小时和1周后进行了随访研究。n结果:140例患者进入研究,评估了124例。 14名患者发展了股腓静脉深静脉血栓。有两个在临床上很明显。十二个(9.6%)与线相关(未插腿的腿正常),而两个(1.6%)仅发生在无环腿中(p 5 0.011;相对风险n6.0;置信区间1.5至23.5)。从插入后的第二天到切除后的第一周,都可能发生与线路相关的DVT。导管相关的DVT的发生与插入尝试的次数,动脉穿刺或血肿,导管插入的持续时间,凝血状态或所注入药物的类型无关。没有发现其他诱因或保护性因素。 12例导管相关性DVT患者中有3例死亡。结论:尽管股动脉途径方便且具有潜在优势,但股动脉线的使用增加了em股深静脉血栓形成的风险。导管相关的DVT可能在插管后的第一天发生,通常是无症状的。选择股骨头插管路径时,应慎重考虑这种增加的风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号