...
首页> 外文期刊>Chest >Increasing Doses of Inhaled Corticosteroids Compared to Adding Long-Acting Inhaled β2-Agonists in Achieving Asthma Control
【24h】

Increasing Doses of Inhaled Corticosteroids Compared to Adding Long-Acting Inhaled β2-Agonists in Achieving Asthma Control

机译:在实现哮喘控制中,与添加长效吸入的β2-激动剂相比,增加吸入糖皮质激素的剂量

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background:Combination therapy with inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) and long-acting β2-agonists (LABAs), or treatment with high doses of ICSs alone improves asthma control when therapy with low-dose ICSs is not sufficient. However, it is not known which of these treatment options is more effective in sustaining asthma control. nnObjectives:To evaluate the effect of increasing the ICS dosage vs adding LABAs on the time spent with well-controlled asthma or poorly controlled asthma. nnMethods:Post hoc analysis of the Formoterol and Corticosteroid Establishing Therapy study, which compared a fourfold increase in the budesonide dose with and without formoterol. nnResults:Time with well-controlled asthma was improved by 19% (95% confidence interval [CI], 3 to 35%; p = 0.017) by adding formoterol, 24 µg/d, to therapy with budesonide, 200 µg/d, compared to 2% (95% CI, –9 to 12%; p = 0.76) with therapy with budesonide, 800 µg/d, alone. Time with well-controlled asthma was further improved by 29% (95% CI, 13 to 47%; p < 0.001) by adding formoterol to therapy with budesonide, 800 µg/d. Time with poorly controlled asthma was significantly reduced using the same interventions by 43% (95% CI, 25 to 57%), 22% (95% CI, 7 to 44%), and 50% (95% CI, 30 to 64%), respectively. Adding formoterol to budesonide was significantly more effective in increasing time with well-controlled asthma when compared to increasing the budesonide dose fourfold (increase, 16%; 95% CI, 1 to 33%; p = 0.035), with a trend for a greater reduction in time with poor control (decrease, 21%; 95% CI, –5 to 42%). nnConclusion:The addition of formoterol to therapy with low-dose budesonide increases the probability of well-controlled asthma compared to a substantial increase in the dose of an ICS.
机译:背景:吸入皮质类固醇(ICSs)和长效β2-激动剂(LABAs)的联合治疗,或仅在小剂量ICSs不足以治疗哮喘时,单独使用大剂量ICSs可以改善哮喘的控制。但是,尚不清楚这些治疗方案中的哪一种在维持哮喘控制方面更有效。 nn目的:评估增加ICS剂量与添加LABA相比对控制良好的哮喘或控制不良的哮喘所花费的时间的影响。 nn方法:对福莫特罗和皮质类固醇建立疗法研究进行事后分析,该研究比较了有无福莫特罗的布地奈德剂量增加了四倍。 nn结果:在布地奈德治疗中加入24 µg / d的福莫特罗,可使哮喘得到良好控制的时间缩短19%(95%置信区间[CI]为3至35%; p = 0.017),与单独使用800 µg / d的布地奈德治疗的2%(95%CI,–9至12%; p = 0.76)相比。通过在布地奈德800微克/天的治疗中添加福莫特罗,可将哮喘得到良好控制的时间进一步缩短29%(95%CI,13%至47%; p <0.001)。使用相同的干预措施,哮喘控制不佳的时间显着减少了43%(95%CI,25至57%),22%(95%CI,7至44%)和50%(95%CI,30至64) %), 分别。与将布地奈德剂量增加四倍(增加16%; 95%CI:1至33%; p = 0.035)相比,向布地奈德中添加福莫特罗在延长哮喘发作时间方面更为有效。减少控制时间(减少21%; CI 95%,-5至42%)。结论:与ICS剂量的大幅增加相比,在低剂量布地奈德治疗中添加福莫特罗可增加哮喘得到良好控制的可能性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号