首页> 外文期刊>Chemosphere >Comparative assessment of acute and chronic ecotoxicity of water soluble fractions of diesel and biodiesel on Daphnia magna and Aliivibrio fischeri
【24h】

Comparative assessment of acute and chronic ecotoxicity of water soluble fractions of diesel and biodiesel on Daphnia magna and Aliivibrio fischeri

机译:柴油和生物柴油水溶性馏分对大型蚤(Daphnia magna)和费氏Aliivibrio fischeri的急性和慢性生态毒性的比较评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The widespread use of diesel as a transportation fuel and the introduction of biodiesel into the world energy matrix increase the likelihood of aquatic contamination with these fuels. In this case, it is important to know the environmental impacts caused by water-soluble fraction (WSF) of these fuels, since it is the portion that can result in long-term impacts and affect regions far away from the location of a spill. Therefore, we evaluated and compared the aquatic ecotoxicity of the WSF of biodiesel and diesel through acute ecotoxicity tests with the aquatic microcrustacean Daphnia magna and the marine bacteria Aliivibrio fischeri, as well as chronic ecotoxicity tests with D. magna. The WSF of diesel was 2.5-4 folds more toxic than the WSF of biodiesel in acute ecotoxicity tests. Similarly, a comparison of the chronic ecotoxicity demonstrated that the WSF of diesel was more toxic than the WSF of biodiesel. WSF of diesel causes chronic effects on reproduction, longevity and growth of D. magna (NOEC was 12.5, 12.5, 6.25%, respectively), while WSF of biodiesel did not present significantly different results compared to the control for any of the parameters evaluated in any of the dilutions tested (NOEC 25%). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that compares the chronic ecotoxicity of WSF of diesel and biodiesel on D. magna. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:柴油广泛用作运输燃料,以及将生物柴油引入世界能源矩阵,增加了这些燃料被水污染的可能性。在这种情况下,重要的是要知道由这些燃料的水溶性部分(WSF)引起的环境影响,因为这是可能导致长期影响并影响远离泄漏地点的区域的部分。因此,我们通过对水生微甲壳类水蚤(Daphnia magna)和海洋细菌Aliivibrio fischeri进行的急性生态毒性测试,以及对D. magna的慢性生态毒性测试,对生物柴油和柴油的WSF的水生生态毒性进行了评估和比较。在急性生态毒性测试中,柴油的WSF毒性比生物柴油的WSF高2.5-4倍。同样,对慢性生态毒性的比较表明,柴油的WSF比生物柴油的WSF更具毒性。柴油的WSF会导致D.magna的繁殖,寿命和生长受到慢性影响(NOEC分别为12.5、12.5、6.25%),而生物柴油的WSF与对照组相比在任何评估的参数方面均没有表现出明显不同。所测试的任何稀释度(NOEC> 25%)。据我们所知,这是首次比较柴油和生物柴油的WSF对D. magna的慢性生态毒性的研究。 (C)2019 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号