首页> 外文期刊>Chimia >Can the Benefits of Using Agricultural Chemicals Outweigh the Risks?
【24h】

Can the Benefits of Using Agricultural Chemicals Outweigh the Risks?

机译:使用农药的收益会超过风险吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Sadly, I was not able to attend the European Parliamentary Workshop on glyphosate organised by Pavel Poc, Member of the European Parliament, EuCheMS and ECTN on 10th May, 2017, but I have watched the video and was impressed by the very high level of scientific debate with most, but sadly not all, approaching the discussion with an open mind. It was appropriate that this debate focussed mainly on the science but it got me thinking about the whole issue of hazard/risk and risk versus benefit. More generally, can it ever be justifiable to use a hazardous chemical? Of course, if the risk can be contained to an acceptably low level. Petrol (gasoline) is a very hazardous material because it forms highly explosive mixtures with air, which is why it works as a fuel. Yet, all of us are happy to drive around with many litres of it in the back of our cars. It is contained in such a way that the risk of an uncontrolled explosion is very slight, but it is not zero (...) You can read the entire article at https://wp.me/P7iPLy-LA.
机译:令人遗憾的是,我未能参加2017年5月10日由欧洲议会议员,EuCheMS和ECTN成员帕维尔·波克(Pavel Poc)举办的欧洲草甘膦议会研讨会,但我观看了录像带,并为科学技术水平很高所打动与大多数人(但不是全部)辩论时以开放的态度进行讨论。这次辩论主要集中在科学上是适当的,但让我思考了整个危害/风险以及风险与收益的问题。更笼统地说,使用危险化学品是否合理?当然,如果可以将风险控制在可接受的低水平。汽油(汽油)是非常危险的材料,因为它与空气形成高度爆炸性的混合物,这就是为什么它可以用作燃料。但是,我们所有人都非常乐意在汽车后座驾驶多升的汽车。它以这样一种方式包含,即不受控制的爆炸的风险很小,但不为零(...)。您可以在https://wp.me/P7iPLy-LA上阅读整篇文章。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Chimia》 |2017年第9期|636-636|共1页
  • 作者

    David Cole-Hamilton;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号