...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Chemical Health and Safety >Applicability of airborne release fraction and respirable fraction values to particulate toxic chemical material releases at DOE sites
【24h】

Applicability of airborne release fraction and respirable fraction values to particulate toxic chemical material releases at DOE sites

机译:空气传播释放分数和可呼吸分数对DOE场所颗粒状有毒化学物质释放的适用性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

A survey of 14 Department of Energy (DOE) sites was performed to identify methodology used in the selection of airborne release fraction (ARF) and respirable fraction (RF) values for chemicals that are used to evaluate concentration exposures (i.e., consequences) for workers and public from accidental release of toxic chemical particulate material. Approximately half of the surveyed sites do not use ARF/RF values because they handle small quantities of chemicals, which are below the threshold planning quantities (TPQs) of 40 CFR 355 and threshold quantities (TQs) of 29 CFR 1910.119, where quantitative concentration (consequence) analysis is not usually performed. The sites that use ARF/RF values for chemicals typically use values that are based on DOE-HDBK-3010-94 that were developed for plutonium and uranium, which may not always be applicable and thus not be reliable. Guidance on ARF/RF use for toxic chemicals based on DOE-HDBK-3010-94 values is discussed in terms of density, particle size, deposition rate, and other properties.
机译:对美国能源部(DOE)的14个地点进行了一次调查,以确定用于选择化学品的空气释放分数(ARF)和可呼吸分数(RF)值的方法,这些方法用于评估工人的浓度暴露(即后果)避免意外释放有毒化学颗粒物质。大约一半的被调查站点不使用ARF / RF值,因为它们处理的化学品数量很少,低于40 CFR 355的阈值计划数量(TPQs)和29 CFR 1910.119的阈值数量(TQs),其中定量浓度(结果)通常不进行分析。对于化学品使用ARF / RF值的站点通常使用基于为E和铀开发的DOE-HDBK-3010-94的值,这些值可能并不总是适用的,因此并不可靠。讨论了基于DOE-HDBK-3010-94值的有毒化学品的ARF / RF使用指南,涉及密度,粒度,沉积速率和其他属性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号