...
首页> 外文期刊>Cancer Causes & Control >Alternative approaches to assessing intervention effectiveness in randomized trials: application in a colorectal cancer screening study
【24h】

Alternative approaches to assessing intervention effectiveness in randomized trials: application in a colorectal cancer screening study

机译:在随机试验中评估干预效果的替代方法:在大肠癌筛查研究中的应用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background Previous analysis of a randomized community-based trial of a multi-component intervention to increase colorectal cancer (CRC) screening among Filipino Americans (n = 548) found significantly higher screening rates in the two intervention groups compared to the control group, when using intent-to-treat analysis and self-reported screening as the outcome. This report describes more nuanced findings obtained from alternative approaches to assessing intervention effectiveness to inform future intervention implementation.
机译:背景先前一项针对多族裔干预以增加菲律宾裔美国人(n = 548)大肠癌(CRC)筛查的随机社区试验的分析发现,与对照组相比,两个干预组的筛查率明显高于对照组。意图治疗分析和自我报告筛查作为结果。本报告介绍了从其他方法中获得的更细微的发现,这些方法是通过评估干预效果来为将来的干预实施提供信息的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号