首页> 外文期刊>Canadian journal of criminology and criminal justice >Rethinking Criminology(ies) through the Inclusion of Political Violence and Armed Conflict as Legitimate Objects of Inquiry
【24h】

Rethinking Criminology(ies) through the Inclusion of Political Violence and Armed Conflict as Legitimate Objects of Inquiry

机译:通过将政治暴力和武装冲突纳入为调查的合法对象,重新思考犯罪学

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Criminology has yet to achieve full recognition as an independent discipline. Its development has been hampered by a multiplicity of often stale debates between a "traditional" and an "alternative" criminology over the legitimate object, theories, and methods of the discipline. Rather than pursuing the debate in its current form, this article explores how focusing on new objects of inquiry and the challenges they represent may help to bridge the crimino-logical divide. By rendering the borders of criminology's object permeable, we may produce a malleable and dynamic discipline that deals with processes of normalization/'differentiation/'othering as well as ordering, governance, and control from different normative and political perspectives, theories, and methods.
机译:犯罪学尚未获得作为独立学科的充分认可。在该学科的合法对象,理论和方法上,“传统”和“替代”犯罪学之间经常进行过时的争论,这阻碍了它的发展。本文没有探讨当前形式的辩论,而是探讨了如何关注新的探究对象及其所代表的挑战可能有助于弥合犯罪学之间的鸿沟。通过使犯罪学对象的边界具有可渗透性,我们可以产生可延展和动态的学科,从不同的规范和政治角度,理论和方法来处理规范化/“差异化” /其他化以及命令,治理和控制的过程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号