首页> 外文期刊>Campus-Wide Information Systems >Two development theories: Ibn-i-Khaldoun and Wallerstein
【24h】

Two development theories: Ibn-i-Khaldoun and Wallerstein

机译:两种发展理论:伊本·卡尔多恩和沃勒斯坦

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - Each day, many different people in different societies are striving within their daily work to advance society. Every society needs to create ideas for further development and in order to become recognised as developed. The purpose of this paper is to show how different cultures at different times created similar ideas and theories to develop their society. Design/methodology/approach - A comparison between the development theories of Ibn-i-Khaldun and Wallerstein's famous "world system theory" is undertaken to show that similar ideas of development were in existence even centuries before. Technically, seminar papers were posted and reviewed on an e-learning platform in order to reach such peer-reviewed assessment in a "Global Studies" curriculum. Findings - The paper shows that the similarity between all developed countries is a strong state and extensive economic activity in different areas among cooperative people. All of these three characteristics are measurable and visible in today's western societies, and also centuries before in other countries (the Golden Age of the Muslim World). Research limitations/implications - Limits to comparing the two development theories of Ibn-i-Khaldun with Wallerstein's world system theory arise because of the large gap in time and the big cultural differences between the authors of the two theories. There is, on one side, Ibn-i-Khaldun in the thirteenth century whose religion (Islam) played an important role in his development theory and on the other side there is a western author, Immanuel Wallerstein in the twentieth century. In Wallerstein's development theory, religion has almost no role. Another point is that Wallerstein's theory provides a guideline to almost all countries for reaching development but Ibn-i-Khaldun's target countries are the Muslim countries which were experiencing decline at his time. Originality/value - Unlike traditional approaches, the present analysis includes early scientific theories from non-European authors. Thus, one of the main objectives of "Global Studies" is fulfilled; namely a trans-disciplinary, globalised perspective.
机译:目的-每天,不同社会中的许多人正在努力开展日常工作以促进社会发展。每个社会都需要为进一步发展创造思想,以便被认可为发达。本文的目的是展示不同文化在不同时期如何产生相似的思想和理论以发展其社会。设计/方法论/方法-将伊本·哈尔敦的发展理论与沃勒斯坦著名的“世界体系理论”进行比较,以表明类似的发展思想甚至在数百年前就已经存在。从技术上讲,研讨会论文是在电子学习平台上发布和审阅的,以便在“全球研究”课程中达到此类同行评审的评估。调查结果-该论文表明,所有发达国家之间的相似之处是一个强大的国家,并且合作社人员在不同地区都有广泛的经济活动。在当今的西方社会中,所有这三个特征都是可以测量和可见的,在其他国家(穆斯林世界的黄金时代)也已经有数百年的历史了。研究的局限性/含义-将伊本·哈尔敦的两种发展理论与沃勒斯坦的世界体系理论进行比较的局限性是由于时间差距大和两种理论的作者之间的文化差异而引起的。一方面是13世纪的伊本·哈尔敦(Ibn-i-Khaldun),其宗教(伊斯兰教)在他的发展理论中起着重要作用,另一方面,西方作家伊曼纽尔·沃勒斯坦(Immanuel Wallerstein)则在20世纪。在沃勒斯坦的发展理论中,宗教几乎没有作用。另一点是,沃勒斯坦的理论为几乎所有国家实现发展提供了指南,但伊本·哈尔敦的目标国家是穆斯林国家,当时穆斯林国家正处于衰落之中。原创性/价值-与传统方法不同,本分析包括来自非欧洲作者的早期科学理论。因此,实现了“全球研究”的主要目标之一;即跨学科的全球化观点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号