...
首页> 外文期刊>The Cambridge Quarterly >‘Self’ in F. R. Leavis and its Significance for Chinese Literature
【24h】

‘Self’ in F. R. Leavis and its Significance for Chinese Literature

机译:里维斯的“自我”及其对中国文学的意义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The moral concern of F. R. Leavis involves a subtle scrutiny of the representation of the self in its various (often unconscious) forms. The Cambridge critic is particularly harsh when the (implied) authorial self is not vigilant against itself. This sensitiveness to the fallibility of the self is both the result and strength of a Christian and self-introspective culture that Leavis shares with his contemporaries, believers and non-believers alike. This paper argues that though a prudent and conscientious self-restraint is a basic Confucian criterion for a gentleman, the self of Chinese poets, however, is entitled to greater licence and wilder self-representation, and as a consequence literary scholars in China are much more tolerant of egotism in different disguises. Perhaps idioms typical of Leavis's ethical sensibility might be tentatively used in analysing and evaluating certain features of Chinese literature.
机译:Leavis的道德问题涉及对自我以各种(通常是无意识的)形式表示的细微检查。当(暗示的)作者自我不警惕自己时,剑桥评论家尤其严厉。对自我的易错性的这种敏感性,是利维斯与他的同时代人,信徒和非信徒共享的基督教和自我反省文化的结果和力量。本文认为,尽管审慎和尽责的自我克制是儒家对绅士的基本准则,但中国诗人的自我却有权获得更大的许可和更宽泛的自我代表,因此,中国的文学学者很多在不同的伪装下更宽容自我主义。也许可以将利维斯伦理敏感性的典型习语暂时用于分析和评估中国文学的某些特征。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The Cambridge Quarterly》 |2012年第1期|p.128-145|共18页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号