首页> 外文期刊>Cambridge journal of economics >Towards an 'accounting view' on money, banking and the macroeconomy: history, empirics, theory
【24h】

Towards an 'accounting view' on money, banking and the macroeconomy: history, empirics, theory

机译:对货币,银行业和宏观经济的“会计观点”:历史,经验,理论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this paper three views are considered which are traditionally associated with 'money cranks' and 'brave heretics'. The first is that the credit nature of money has macroeconomic significance. The second is that financial development can be bad for economic growth. The third is that macroeconomic models need to be explicitly monetary macroeconomic models. It is argued that in each of these three areas, there has been a recent shift in mainstream economic opinion. This suggests new opportunities for meaningful debate between heterodox and orthodox schools on money and finance. It is further argued, following Skaggs (2003), that a common meeting ground could be an 'accounting view' of economics. This is a mode of macroeconomic analysis which explicitly uses accounting definitions, identities (that credit is also debt, or that flows of a variable affect the stock of that variable) or accounting methods (e.g. decomposing different kinds of liabilities, or linking flows of liquidity to flows of transactions) to structure and direct the analysis. The accounting view is highly pluralist yet clearly defined. I discuss its applications to each of the three views.
机译:在本文中,考虑了三种与传统上与“金钱曲柄”和“勇敢的异教徒”相关的观点。首先是货币的信贷性质具有宏观经济意义。其次,金融发展可能不利于经济增长。第三,宏观经济模型必须明确地是货币宏观经济模型。有人认为,在这三个领域中,主流经济学观点最近都发生了变化。这为异性和正统派之间关于货币和金融的有意义的辩论提供了新的机会。继斯卡格斯(Skaggs,2003)之后,人们进一步认为,一个共同的见解可能是经济学的一种“会计观点”。这是一种宏观经济分析的模式,它明确使用会计定义,身份(信用也是债务,或者变量的流量影响该变量的存量)或会计方法(例如,分解不同种类的负债或将流动资金联系起来)交易流程)以结构化和指导分析。会计观点具有高度多元性,但定义明确。我将针对三个视图分别讨论其应用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号