首页> 外文期刊>Business week >Why Some Deals Are Best Done In-House
【24h】

Why Some Deals Are Best Done In-House

机译:为什么一些交易最好在内部完成

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

When PPR, the French owner of Gucci, sold a stake in its African distributor CFAO in August, it didn't use an investment bank to handle the transaction. Instead, the company turned to an in-house mergers-and acquisitions-team led by a former France Telecom M&A executive. "When we can, we do it on our own," says group managing director Jean-Francois Palus.Worldwide deal volume has plunged 53 percent since 2007, a victim of the weak global recovery and the European debt crisis. With the average size of deals shrinking 25 percent in that time-to $149 million, according to data compiled by Bloomberg-European companies such as BP and Siemens are relying on their own staffers for smaller transactions.
机译:法国古驰(Pucci)的所有者PPR在八月出售了其非洲分销商CFAO的股份时,它没有使用投资银行来处理交易。取而代之的是,该公司转向由法国电信并购高管领导的内部并购团队。集团董事总经理让-弗朗索瓦·帕卢斯(Jean-Francois Palus)表示:“我们会尽力而为。”自2007年以来,全球交易量已下降53%,这是全球复苏乏力和欧洲债务危机的受害者。根据彭博社欧洲公司(BP和西门子等公司)汇编的数据,在此期间,平均交易规模减少了25%,降至1.49亿美元。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号