【24h】

Is It Illegal?

机译:是违法的吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Its alleged punishment of Marketplace sellers for offering lower prices on rival websites-those products are harder to find and buy on Amazon-could subject it to antitrust liability. Such actions allegedly have led to higher prices. The company would need to show a procompetitive business rationale for the conduct. Amazon has said it doesn't retaliate against these sellers.Apple s requirement that iOS apps for mobile devices be distributed solely through its App Store, along with its alleged obstruction of competitors such as Spotify, has been criticized as predatory and anticompetitive. Apple must demonstrate procompetitive business reasons for its conduct-better security and performance, for example-to win any challenge. Apple has said the App Store is a new marketplace that has allowed Spotify to thrive and created opportunities for artists and entrepreneurs.
机译:它涉嫌惩罚市场卖家为竞争对手网站提供更低的价格 - 这些产品更难找到并在亚马逊购买,可以将其视为反垄断责任。据称,这些行动导致了更高的价格。该公司需要展示采购业务理由进行行为。亚马逊表示,它没有针对这些卖家报复。Apple要求移动设备的iOS应用程序仅通过其App Store分发,以及其所谓的竞争对手,如Spotify,已被批评为掠夺性和反竞争。 Apple必须展示一个先进的商业原因,以便进行更好的安全性和性能,例如 - 赢得任何挑战。 Apple表示,App Store是一个新的市场,允许Spotify茁壮成长和为艺术家和企业家创造的机会。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Bloomberg business week》 |2019年第4634期|43-43|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 22:14:00

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号