...
首页> 外文期刊>Business process management journal >Wand and Weber's good decomposition conditions for BPMN: An interpretation and differences to Event-Driven Process Chains
【24h】

Wand and Weber's good decomposition conditions for BPMN: An interpretation and differences to Event-Driven Process Chains

机译:Wand和Weber对于BPMN的良好分解条件:对事件驱动流程链的解释和差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to specify the decomposition conditions of Wand and Weber for the Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN). Therefore, an interpretation of the conditions for BPMN is derived and compared to a specification of the conditions for enhanced Event-Driven Process Chains (eEPCs). Based on these results, guidelines for a conformance check of BPMN and eEPC models with the decomposition conditions are shown. Further, guidelines for decomposition are formulated for BPMN models. The usability of the decomposition guidelines is tested with modelling experts. Design/methodology/approach - An approach building on a representational mapping is used for specifying the decomposition conditions. Therefore, ontological constructs of the Bunge-Wand-Weber ontology are mapped to corresponding modelling constructs and an interpretation of the decomposition conditions for BPMN is derived. Guidelines for a conformance check are then defined. Based on these results, decomposition guidelines are formulated. Their usability is tested in interviews. Findings - The research shows that the decomposition conditions stemming from the information systems discipline can be transferred to business process modelling. However, the interpretation of the decomposition conditions depends on specific characteristics of a modelling language. Based on a thorough specification of the conditions, it is possible to derive guidelines for a conformance check of process models with the conditions. In addition, guidelines for decomposition are developed and tested. In the study, these are perceived as understandable and helpful by experts. Research limitations/implications - Research approaches based on representational mappings are subjected to subjectivity. However, by having three researchers performing the approach independently, subjectivity can be mitigated. Further, only ten experts participated in the usability test, which is therefore to be considered as a first step in a more comprising evaluation. Practical implications - This paper provides the process modeller with guidelines enabling a conformance check of BPMN and eEPC process models with the decomposition conditions. Further, guidelines for decomposing BPMN models are introduced. Originality/value - This paper is the first to specify Wand and Weber's decomposition conditions for process modelling with BPMN. A comparison to eEPCs shows, that the ontological expressiveness influences the interpretation of the conditions. Further, guidelines for decomposing BPMN models as well as for checking their adherence to the decomposition conditions are presented.
机译:目的-本文的目的是为业务流程模型和表示法(BPMN)指定Wand和Weber的分解条件。因此,可以得出对BPMN条件的解释,并将其与增强事件驱动过程链(eEPC)的条件规范进行比较。根据这些结果,显示了对BPMN和eEPC模型与分解条件进行一致性检查的指南。此外,为BPMN模型制定了分解准则。分解准则的可用性已通过建模专家进行了测试。设计/方法/方法-建立在代表性映射上的方法用于指定分解条件。因此,将Bunge-Wand-Weber本体的本体结构映射到相应的建模结构,并得出BPMN分解条件的解释。然后定义一致性检查的准则。基于这些结果,制定了分解准则。他们的可用性在访谈中进行了测试。结果-研究表明,信息系统学科产生的分解条件可以转移到业务流程建模中。但是,分解条件的解释取决于建模语言的特定特征。基于对条件的详尽说明,有可能导出有关过程模型与条件的一致性检查的准则。此外,还制定并测试了分解准则。在研究中,这些被专家认为是可以理解和有帮助的。研究局限/含义-基于代表性映射的研究方法具有主观性。但是,通过让三名研究人员独立执行该方法,可以减轻主观性。此外,只有十名专家参加了可用性测试,因此,这被认为是更全面的评估的第一步。实际意义-本文为流程建模者提供了指导,使他们能够检查BPMN和eEPC流程模型与分解条件的一致性。此外,介绍了用于分解BPMN模型的准则。原创性/价值-本文是第一个为使用BPMN进行流程建模指定Wand和Weber分解条件的文件。与eEPC的比较表明,本体表达会影响条件的解释。此外,还提供了用于分解BPMN模型以及检查其对分解条件的遵循性的准则。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号