首页> 外文期刊>Business Communications Review >BGP/MPLS IP VPNs: Better Than ATM/Frame Relay
【24h】

BGP/MPLS IP VPNs: Better Than ATM/Frame Relay

机译:BGP / MPLS IP VPN:优于ATM /帧中继

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Enterprise customers spend considerably more on private line, public frame relay and public ATM services than on public IP networks. This is likely to change over the next few years, because ATM/FR is no longer as attractive to either enterprises or providers.Part of the problem with ATM/FR services is price, which is unnecessarily high because of low levels of competition and limited availability, compared to globally-available ISP services. But both FR and ATM face other challenges as well.FR networks have been popular for remote office links, many of which still carry SNA applications running at only 56 kbps. This worked fine for distributed transaction processing, where traffic volumes are small.
机译:与在公共IP网络上相比,企业客户在专用线路,公共帧中继和公共ATM服务上的支出要多得多。未来几年这种情况可能会改变,因为ATM / FR对企业或提供商不再具有吸引力。ATM / FR服务的部分问题是价格,与全球可用的ISP服务相比,由于竞争水平低和可用性有限,价格过高。但是FR和ATM也都面临其他挑战。FR网络已广泛用于远程办公室链接,其中许多仍然承载仅以56 kbps运行的SNA应用程序。这对于流量很小的分布式事务处理很好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号