...
首页> 外文期刊>OIML bulletin >Experience gained from a comparative examination of measuring instrument software
【24h】

Experience gained from a comparative examination of measuring instrument software

机译:通过比较测量仪器软件获得的经验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This paper describes an approach to the validation of the guidance document WELMEC 7.2 "Software Guide (Measuring Instruments Directive 2004/22/EC)". The aim of the Guide, which was developed in the EU-funded project "MID-SOFTWARE", is to support a harmonized implementation of the MID with regard to software in measuring instruments. Although the Guide is relatively comprehensive, a residual uncertainty among national metrological institutes and manufacturers is still present and concerns the uniform implementation of the Guide. A comparative examination of measuring instrument software appeared as being the most appropriate way to resolve these concerns. Six European national metrology institutes volunteered to participate in the experiment. Remarkable results were achieved, both with respect to improvements in the Guide and also with respect to general experience. The results proved the suitability of the Guide for its intended purpose. In addition, the experiment provided valuable knowledge about the prerequisites and necessary procedures to perform such types of comparisons. The approach proved to be basically suitable for application in other similar fields. The experiment was restricted as regards the coverage of requirements of the Guide. In particular, more complex IT configurations were not included. It is considered as extremely beneficial to repeat such comparative tests with other measuring instruments in order to increase the validation coverage of the Guide.
机译:本文介绍了一种验证指南文件WELMEC 7.2“软件指南(测量仪器指令2004/22 / EC)”的方法。该指南的目的是在欧盟资助的项目“ MID-SOFTWARE”中开发的,目的是支持在测量仪器软件方面统一实施MID。尽管该指南相对全面,但国家计量机构和制造商之间仍然存在不确定性,并涉及该指南的统一实施。对测量仪器软件的比较检查似乎是解决这些问题的最合适方法。六家欧洲国家计量机构自愿参加了该实验。在《指南》的改进和一般经验方面均取得了显著成果。结果证明《指南》适合其预期目的。此外,该实验还提供了有关进行此类比较的前提条件和必要步骤的宝贵知识。事实证明,该方法基本上适用于其他类似领域。关于《指南》要求的覆盖范围,实验受到了限制。特别是,不包括更复杂的IT配置。为了增加本指南的确认范围,与其他测量仪器重复进行这种比较测试被认为是极其有益的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号