首页> 外文期刊>Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America >Surface Rupturing and Buried Dynamic-Rupture Models Calibrated with Statistical Observations of Past Earthquakes
【24h】

Surface Rupturing and Buried Dynamic-Rupture Models Calibrated with Statistical Observations of Past Earthquakes

机译:用过去地震的统计观测值校准的地表破裂和埋藏动态破裂模型

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In the context of the slip-weakening friction model and simplified asperity models for stress state, we calibrate dynamic rupture models for buried and surface-rupturing earthquakes constrained with statistical observations of past earthquakes. These observations are the kinematic source models derived from source inversions of ground-motion and empirical source models of seismic moment and rupture area. The calibrated parameters are the stress-drop distribution on the fault and average stress drop. We develop a set of dynamic rupture models that consist of asperities and surrounding background areas. The distribution of dynamic stress drop outside the asperity is characterized by a fraction of the stress drop on the asperity. From this set of models, we identify dynamic fault models with defined stress-drop characteristics that satisfy the observations. The selected dynamic fault models show that surface-rupturing earthquakes are characterized by a large area of negative stress-drop surrounding the asperities, while buried earthquakes present positive or zero stress drop. In addition, the calibrated fault models that match the observations show that the average stress drop is independent of earthquake size for buried earthquakes, but scale dependent for surface-rupturing earthquakes. This suggests that, in the context of our parameterization, buried earthquakes follow self-similarity scaling, and surface-rupturing earthquakes break this self-similarity. We apply the calibrated dynamic models to simulate near-source ground motion consistent with observations that suggest that buried earthquakes generate stronger ground motion than surface-rupturing earthquakes at high frequency. We propose possible mechanisms that satisfy this observation, as follows: buried rupture has a hypocenter location below the asperity; this can produce strong directivity of the slip velocity function toward the free surface. That effect, in addition to a reduced fault area and low fracture energy during rupture, may be significant in enhancing high-frequency ground motion. On the other hand, surface-rupturing earthquakes have a shallow hypocenter, large fracture energy on the asperities, and enhanced energy absorption due to large areas of negative stress drop in the background area. These characteristics of large earthquakes inhibit severe directivity effects on the slip velocity function directly toward the free surface, reducing the high-frequency ground motion.
机译:在弱化滑动摩擦模型和简化的应力状态粗糙模型的背景下,我们根据过去地震的统计观测值,对埋藏和地表破裂地震的动态破裂模型进行了校准。这些观测结果是从地震动源反演得到的运动源模型,以及地震矩和破裂区的经验源模型。校准的参数是断层上的应力降分布和平均应力降。我们开发了一组由凹凸不平和周围背景区域组成的动态破裂模型。粗糙表面之外的动态应力降的分布特征是粗糙表面上的应力降的一部分。从这套模型中,我们确定具有定义的应力降特征的动态断层模型,这些特征可以满足观测要求。选定的动态断层模型表明,地表破裂地震的特征是围绕粗糙区域的区域具有很大的负应力降,而埋藏地震的应力降为正或零。此外,与观测结果相匹配的校准断层模型表明,对于埋藏式地震,平均应力降与地震规模无关,而与地表破裂地震的规模有关。这表明,在参数化的背景下,埋藏地震遵循自相似缩放,而地表破裂地震则破坏了自相似。我们应用校准后的动力学模型来模拟近源地震动,这与观测结果一致,这些观测结果表明,在高频下,地下地震比地表破裂地震产生的地震动更强。我们提出了满足这一观察结果的可能机制,如下所示:埋藏破裂的中心位置在凹陷以下;这可以使滑动速度函数朝向自由表面产生强烈的方向性。除了减少断层面积和降低断裂过程中的低断裂能外,这种效果在增强高频地面运动方面可能也很重要。另一方面,地表破裂地震的震源较浅,粗糙处的破裂能量较大,并且由于背景区域中的大面积负应力下降而导致能量吸收增加。大地震的这些特征抑制了直接向自由表面滑动速度函数的严重方向性影响,从而降低了高频地震动。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America》 |2008年第3期|p.1147-1164|共18页
  • 作者单位

    Luis A. Dalguer* Department of Geological Sciences, San Diego State University, 5500 Campanile Dr., San Diego, California 92182 ldalguer@moho.sdsu.edu Hiroe Miyake Earthquake Research Institute, University of Tokyo, 1-1-1 Yayoi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0032, Japan hiroe@eri.u-tokyo.ac.jp Steven M. Day Department of Geological Sciences, San Diego State University, 5500 Campanile Dr., San Diego, California 92182 day@moho.sdsu.edu Kojiro Irikura Disaster Prevention Research Center, Aichi Institute of Technology, 1247 Yachigusa, Yakusa, Toyota, Aichi 470-0392, Japan irikura@geor.or.jp Correspondence: * Now at Institute of Geophysics, ETH Hoenggerberg, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland.;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号