首页> 外文期刊>Bulletin of economic research >A RE-EXAMINATION OF REAL INTEREST PARITY IN CEECs USING 'OLD' AND 'NEW' SECOND-GENERATION PANEL UNIT ROOT TESTS
【24h】

A RE-EXAMINATION OF REAL INTEREST PARITY IN CEECs USING 'OLD' AND 'NEW' SECOND-GENERATION PANEL UNIT ROOT TESTS

机译:使用“旧”和“新”第二代面板单元根测试重新测试CEEC中的实际利率平价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This study applies old' and new' second-generation panel unit root tests to check the validity of the long-run real interest rate parity (RIP) hypothesis for ten Central and Eastern European Countries (CEECs) with respect to the Euro area and an average of the CEECs' real interest rates. When the new' panel unit root tests are carried out relative to the Euro area rate as reference, we confirm the results of previous studies that support the RIP hypothesis, and the results of the old' tests used as a benchmark. Nevertheless, when the new' tests are performed using the average of the CEECs' rate as reference, our results are mitigated, revealing that the hypothesis of CEECs' interest rates convergence cannot be taken for granted. From a robustness analysis perspective, our findings indicate that the RIP hypothesis for CEECs should be considered with caution, because the RIP hypothesis is sensitive to the retained reference rate for computing the real interest rate differential, and also to the retained countries in the sample.
机译:这项研究采用了旧的和新的第二代面板单位根检验,以检验十个中欧和东欧国家(CEEC)相对于欧元区以及长期汇率的长期实际利率平价(RIP)假设的有效性。 CEEC实际利率的平均值。当相对于欧元区汇率进行新的“面板单位根检验”时,我们确认了以前支持RIP假设的研究结果,并将旧的检验结果用作基准。然而,当以中东欧国家的利率平均值作为参考进行新的检验时,我们的结果得到了缓解,这表明中东欧国家利率趋同的假设不能被认为是理所当然的。从健壮性分析的角度来看,我们的发现表明,应谨慎考虑CEEC的RIP假设,因为RIP假设对计算实际利率差异的保留参考汇率敏感,也对样本中的保留国家敏感。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号