...
首页> 外文期刊>Built environment project and asset management >Influential factors of life cycle management in education PFI projects
【24h】

Influential factors of life cycle management in education PFI projects

机译:教育PFI项目生命周期管理的影响因素

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Purpose - It has been claimed that the private finance initiative (PFI) provides value for money in the overall life of the project through the lifecycle costing (LCC) process under the umbrella of lifecycle management (LCM). The available literature points to the fact that LCC is very important in getting value for money from PFI projects. However, there is no literature available on the effect of the use of LCM in PFI projects in the UK. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to explore the factors that influence the success of LCM in educational PFI projects. Design/methodology/approach - The paper adopts a post-positivist approach to literature review. Purposive sampling is utilised with a mixed methodological approach. 6 qualitative inductive interviews offer key themes, which are further investigated using quantitative deductive questionnaires, of which 35 were issued and 26 were returned. Findings - The paper provides empirical insights about the key success factors of LCM in the education sector. The results highlight the necessity of quality standardized data collection in a big data form. It highlights the need for a cultural shift from short- to long-term profit maximisation and service provision by the use of LCM in the PFI education sector. Research limitations/implications - A purposive sample was used to maximise the validity of data collection. Although this method has garnered concise and clear results, it is understood that this study is limited into a niche sector and a set of subsequently niche professionals. It is recommended that a larger sample be utilised and the spectrum of PFI sectors be opened up to further explore the topic. Practical implications - Further investigations across different sectors of PFI project may be viewed as a good comparison, sectors such as health, accommodation and prisons. Gathering responses across all sector types could have resulted in a greater number of responses received and offer greater validity to this study. Social implications - While key success factors are clearly identified, fragmentation is seen as a barrier to the wholesale collection of such data. The responsibility, obligation to collect data for the benefit of future projects is not a priority for SMEs with little or no incentive to consider the progression of the sector. Albeit, there is evidence of one particular successful constructor/SPV, which is consolidating their business and are experiencing greater and sustained success. Originality/value - This paper identifies previously unknown key influencing factors of success for educational PFI projects in relation to LCM.
机译:目的-据称,私人融资计划(PFI)通过生命周期管理(LCM)框架下的生命周期成本(LCC)流程在项目的整个生命周期内提供物有所值。现有文献指出,LCC对于从PFI项目获得物有所值非常重要。但是,在英国,没有关于LCM在PFI项目中使用效果的文献。因此,本文的目的是探讨影响LCM在教育性PFI项目中成功的因素。设计/方法/方法-本文采用后实证主义方法进行文献综述。目的抽样与混合方法论方法一起使用。 6个定性的归纳式访谈提供了关键主题,并使用定量演绎问卷进行了进一步调查,其中发布了35个主题,返回了26个主题。调查结果-本文提供了有关LCM在教育领域成功的关键因素的经验见解。结果强调了以大数据形式进行质量标准化数据收集的必要性。它强调需要通过在PFI教育部门中使用LCM,将文化从短期利润最大化转变为长期利润最大化和提供服务。研究局限性/意义-使用有目的的样本可最大程度地提高数据收集的有效性。尽管此方法获得了简洁明了的结果,但可以理解的是,这项研究仅限于利基行业和一组后来的利基专业人士。建议使用更大的样本,并开放PFI部门的频谱,以进一步探讨该主题。实际意义-可以将PFI项目不同部门之间的进一步调查视为一个很好的比较,例如卫生,住宿和监狱等部门。收集所有部门类型的响应可能会导致收到更多的响应,并为这项研究提供更大的有效性。社会影响-尽管明确确定了关键的成功因素,但零散被视为大规模收集此类数据的障碍。对于中小型企业来说,为将来的项目而收集数据的责任和义务并不是优先考虑的事项,而对中小型企业而言,几乎没有或没有动机去考虑该部门的发展。尽管有证据表明,一个特定的成功构造函数/ SPV正在巩固其业务并正在取得更大且持续的成功。原创性/价值-本文确定了与LCM相关的教育性PFI项目成功的先前未知的关键影响因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号