【24h】

LOCKED OUT

机译:被锁在外面

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

How should we finance social and affordable housing in the UK? This question has been at the heart of housing policy for the past 50 years or more. In the immediate post-war era when there was an obvious need for a large-scale housebuilding programme, the government provided a "bricks and mortar" subsidy to cover a large part of the capital cost, so that council housing could be let at affordable rents. This underpinned a rapid expansion of council housing, which by the late seventies had come to account for around one third of all housing in Britain. In the early seventies the Conservatives under Edward Heath proposed a shift in favour of personal subsidies, accompanied by an increase in rent levels. Although this did not survive the fall of the Heath government in 1974, the policy returned in the eighties under Thatcher.
机译:我们应该如何为英国的社会和经济适用住房提供资金?在过去的50多年中,这个问题一直是住房政策的核心。在战后紧迫的时代,即明显需要大规模的房屋建造计划时,政府提供了“砖块和灰泥”补贴,以支付大部分的资本成本,从而使议会住房可以负担得起。租金。这支撑了议会房屋的迅速扩张,到70年代后期,议会房屋已占英国全部房屋的三分之一左右。七十年代初期,爱德华·希思(Edward Heath)领导下的保守党提议改变对个人补贴的政策,并伴随着租金水平的提高。尽管这在1974年希思政府垮台后仍然无法幸免,但该政策在撒切尔(Thatcher)统治下的80年代重新出现。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Building》 |2011年第41期|p.22-23|共2页
  • 作者

    Nick Raynsford;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:35:32

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号