【24h】

TALL STORY

机译:故事高

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Can tall buildings ever be sustainable? It's a simple question that poses a very complicated set of opposing answers. Perhaps the traditional view of tall buildings is that they are a largely unsustainable form of development. This is a viewpoint easily served by the scarring experience of many of the failed tower blocks of the fifties and sixties and the corrosive urban and environmental conditions that came with them. Moreover, critics point to a slew of familiar social and environmental evidence as justification ranging from energy inefficiency, poor life expectancy and overheating risk to physical anonymity, economic severance and social polarisation. Even Ken Shuttleworth, one of the designers of London's "Gherkin" tower, famously decreed that era of the glass skyscraper is, or at least should be, dead.
机译:高层建筑能否可持续发展?这是一个简单的问题,提出了非常复杂的对立答案。高层建筑的传统观点也许是,它们在很大程度上是不可持续的发展形式。五十年代和六十年代许多失败的塔楼的结疤经历以及随之而来的腐蚀性城市和环境条件,很容易使人接受这种观点。此外,批评者指出,许多熟悉的社会和环境证据是正当的,范围从能源效率低下,预期寿命差和过热风险到匿名,经济遣散和社会两极分化。甚至连伦敦“小黄瓜”塔楼的设计师之一肯·沙特尔沃斯(Ken Shuttleworth)都曾著名地宣布,玻璃摩天大楼的时代已经或者至少应该已经死了。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Building》 |2015年第8期|40-43|共4页
  • 作者

    Ike Ijeh;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号