首页> 外文期刊>Building >Letters & comment
【24h】

Letters & comment

机译:字母和评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Re: "Persimmon extends customer retention period to a week" (5 July, building.co.uk). The severely restricted time allowed to a new homeowner to identify faults in the home that they have purchased from a developer seems to be unfair as it creates an imbalance in the positions of the parties to the detriment of the consumer. This looks to be an attempt by the developer to restrict its liability and as such could be rendered ineffective under the Consumer Rights Act 2015. Additional remedies could be available to the consumer if the developer fails to rectify any faults or defects discovered by the buyer and within a reasonable time. The matter may of course be referred to a dispute resolution entity as allowed for under the Consumer Code for Home Builders if the developer fails to act in a professionally diligent manner. Much of the problem could be avoided if the housebuilder actually paid greater attention to the quality of construction employed in the building of their houses.
机译:RE:“柿子将客户保留期扩展到一周”(7月5日,建筑.Co.uk)。被允许的严重限制时间允许新的房主识别他们从开发商购买的家中的错误似乎是不公平的,因为它在缔约方损害消费者的职位上创造了不平衡。这看起来是开发人员限制其责任的企图,因为2015年消费者权利法案可能会导致无效。如果开发商未能纠正买方发现的任何故障或缺陷,则可以向消费者提供额外的补救措施在合理的时间内。如果开发人员未能以专业勤勉的方式行事,此事可能会被提交允许的争议解决实体。如果房屋建筑物实际上高度关注建筑物建设中的建筑质量,则可以避免大部分问题。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Building》 |2019年第28期|20-21|共2页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 22:31:20

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号