首页> 外文期刊>Building and Environment >Biodiversity impact assessment of building's roofs based on Life Cycle Assessment methods
【24h】

Biodiversity impact assessment of building's roofs based on Life Cycle Assessment methods

机译:基于生命周期评估方法的建筑物屋顶生物多样性影响评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

To fight against the biodiversity loss and to take advantage of ecosystem services that nature can offer, urban planners integrate green spaces in urban projects. However to assess green spaces, attention is generally paid to local biodiversity (i.e. "in situ") which concerns the plot on which buildings are constructed. The biodiversity impacted outside the construction site (i.e. "ex situ") which concerns the extraction of materials, transportation and waste, is rarely associated to the project assessment.In this study, two endpoint Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methods are applied: ReCiPe 2016 and Impact World + to assess a conventional roof and three different types of green roofs. As Life Cycle Inventory (LCI) data about urban plants are missing, we created new data to model the vegetation layer of green roofs by collecting information nearby plants nursery.This work shows that 1) extensive green roof generates the least biodiversity loss, 2) "ex situ" biodiversity is 10 times more impacted than "in situ" biodiversity, 3) the impact of the vegetation layer on the biodiversity loss is significant.LCA methods do not enable to cover all pressures threatening biodiversity and they also lack precision to assess "in situ" biodiversity. Nevertheless, their main strength is to consider "ex situ" biodiversity along the value chain of the studied systems.Coupling LCA with ecological expertise should improve the assessment by taking into account local specificities and both negative and positive impacts of a system (e.g. "in situ" biodiversity gains with green roofs).
机译:为了与生物多样性的丧失作斗争并利用自然提供的生态系统服务,城市规划人员将绿色空间纳入了城市项目。但是,为了评估绿色空间,通常要注意与建筑建筑物地块有关的当地生物多样性(即“就地”)。在建筑工地外部受到影响的生物多样性(即“异地”)与材料,运输和废物的提取有关,很少与项目评估相关。在本研究中,应用了两种终点生命周期评估(LCA)方法:ReCiPe 2016和Impact World +评估常规屋顶和三种不同类型的绿色屋顶。由于缺少有关城市植物的生命周期清单(LCI)数据,我们通过收集附近植物苗圃的信息创建了新数据来模拟绿色屋顶的植被层。这项工作表明1)广泛的绿色屋顶对生物多样性造成的损失最少; 2) “非原生境”生物多样性受到的影响比“原生境”生物多样性的影响大10倍; 3)植被层对生物多样性丧失的影响是巨大的。LCA方法无法涵盖威胁生物多样性的所有压力,而且缺乏评估“原位”生物多样性的精确度。尽管如此,它们的主要优势是要在研究系统的价值链中考虑“非原生境”生物多样性。将LCA与生态专业知识相结合应通过考虑当地的特殊性以及系统的负面和正面影响来改善评估(例如,屋顶绿化带来的“就地”生物多样性收益)。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Building and Environment》 |2019年第7期|133-144|共12页
  • 作者单位

    Univ Paris Est, Ctr Sci & Tech Batiment, 24 Rue Joseph Fourier, F-38400 St Martin Dheres, France|Museum Natl Hist Nat, UMR CESCO MNHN UPMC CNRS, 43 Rue Buffon, F-75005 Paris, France;

    Univ Paris Est, Ctr Sci & Tech Batiment, 24 Rue Joseph Fourier, F-38400 St Martin Dheres, France;

    Museum Natl Hist Nat, UMR CESCO MNHN UPMC CNRS, 43 Rue Buffon, F-75005 Paris, France;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Life cycle assessment; Biodiversity; Green roofs; Urban plants life cycle inventories;

    机译:生命周期评估;生物多样性;绿色屋顶;城市植物生命周期清单;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 04:22:16

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号