【24h】

LETTERS

机译:字母

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A sampling of reader responses to the March editorial, "End the battle of FSC vs. SFI wood in LEED":rnIf the Editor-in-Chief is so uninformed that he believes there is no difference in forest certification programs, then I can no longer trust the contents of this magazine.rnFor about a decade, I have been wondering how it ever became possible that no other building material has to jump through hoops and prove its environmental worthiness to USGBC but the honest truth is that you can't measure a product's environmental greatness when there is no program to measure it by. What environmental story could steel, concrete, aluminum, glass, tile, gypsum, etc., possibly tell that would make it look good?
机译:读者对3月社论中“结束LEED中FSC与SFI木材之战的回应”的回应样本:rn如果总编辑不了解情况,以至于他认为森林认证计划没有区别,那么我不能过去十年来,我一直在想,没有其他建筑材料能够跨过箍,向USGBC证明其环境价值,但诚实的事实是,您无法衡量没有程序来衡量产品对环境的影响。钢材,混凝土,铝,玻璃,瓷砖,石膏等可能引起什么样的环境影响?

著录项

  • 来源
    《Building design & construction》 |2010年第4期|p.10-11|共2页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号